Maxillofacial district osteomas are benign lesions with very slow growth. The most frequent localization is the frontal sinus, about 57% of all paranasal cavity osteomas; less frequently, they can be located in the ethmoidal sinus or sphenoidal and maxillary. Etiology has not completely clarified yet, nevertheless, there are 3 main pathogenetic theories: osteogenic, traumatic, and infective. Open procedures represent the gold standard, but there is still an unsolved debate for the best treatment option. Endoscopic techniques offer an alternative approach, enabling closer and more direct visualization of the anatomy as well as avoiding damage to surrounding structures. In our study, we analyzed all patients treated with endoscopic approach for paranasal sinus osteomas in the ENT unit of the University of Varese and compared them with patients treated for the same pathology with open surgery in the Maxillofacial Department of the University of Rome "La Sapienza." the purpose of the work was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 procedures. In conclusion, this study underlines the importance of flexibility in surgical approach decision, which must fit the different issues of the pathology and of the patient.

Osteomas of the Maxillofacial District: Endoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery / Paolo, Castelnuovo; Valentini, Valentino; Giovannetti, Filippo; Maurizio, Bignami; Cassoni, Andrea; Iannetti, Giorgio. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1049-2275. - 19:6(2008), pp. 1446-1452. [10.1097/scs.0b013e31818b417d]

Osteomas of the Maxillofacial District: Endoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery

VALENTINI, VALENTINO;GIOVANNETTI, FILIPPO;CASSONI, ANDREA;IANNETTI, Giorgio
2008

Abstract

Maxillofacial district osteomas are benign lesions with very slow growth. The most frequent localization is the frontal sinus, about 57% of all paranasal cavity osteomas; less frequently, they can be located in the ethmoidal sinus or sphenoidal and maxillary. Etiology has not completely clarified yet, nevertheless, there are 3 main pathogenetic theories: osteogenic, traumatic, and infective. Open procedures represent the gold standard, but there is still an unsolved debate for the best treatment option. Endoscopic techniques offer an alternative approach, enabling closer and more direct visualization of the anatomy as well as avoiding damage to surrounding structures. In our study, we analyzed all patients treated with endoscopic approach for paranasal sinus osteomas in the ENT unit of the University of Varese and compared them with patients treated for the same pathology with open surgery in the Maxillofacial Department of the University of Rome "La Sapienza." the purpose of the work was to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 procedures. In conclusion, this study underlines the importance of flexibility in surgical approach decision, which must fit the different issues of the pathology and of the patient.
2008
endoscopic; maxillofacial; osteoma; osteomas
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Osteomas of the Maxillofacial District: Endoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery / Paolo, Castelnuovo; Valentini, Valentino; Giovannetti, Filippo; Maurizio, Bignami; Cassoni, Andrea; Iannetti, Giorgio. - In: THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY. - ISSN 1049-2275. - 19:6(2008), pp. 1446-1452. [10.1097/scs.0b013e31818b417d]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/358153
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 53
social impact