This study focuses on the changes in perception of dyadic adjustment following childbirth and on the role of attachment (as a risk or protection factor) in the way partners adjust to this stressful event. Four attachment configurations were analyzed which emerged from the concordance or discordance between the ‘‘generalized’’ and the ‘‘specific’’ states of mind in the individual, and a longitudinal and cross-sectional study on N = 206 participants (104 ‘‘new-parents’’ and 102 ‘‘nonparents by choice’’) was then implemented. These results showed that individuals who became parents had lower dyadic adjustment levels than nonparents (Lrtest = 395.03; p < .001). This decline in values seemed to be more pronounced for the ‘‘affectional expression’’ subscale (b = 3.69) and suggests that in our sample the expression of love toward a partner might be particularly subject to stress due to the arrival of a child. Considering the role played in the attachment configuration of each individual, a significant effect upon InsecureGEN/InsecureSPEC individuals was found (p = .015). This then would seem to indicate that these individuals might be more vulnerable to perceiving worse adjustment levels during the transition to first-time parenthood.

Adjustment of Couples Following Childbirth The Role of Generalized and Specific States of Mind in an Italian Sample / Velotti, Patrizia; Rosetta, Castellano; Zavattini, Giulio Cesare. - In: EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST. - ISSN 1016-9040. - 16:1(2011), pp. 1-10. [10.1027/1016-9040/a000022]

Adjustment of Couples Following Childbirth The Role of Generalized and Specific States of Mind in an Italian Sample

Patrizia Velotti;ZAVATTINI, Giulio Cesare
2011

Abstract

This study focuses on the changes in perception of dyadic adjustment following childbirth and on the role of attachment (as a risk or protection factor) in the way partners adjust to this stressful event. Four attachment configurations were analyzed which emerged from the concordance or discordance between the ‘‘generalized’’ and the ‘‘specific’’ states of mind in the individual, and a longitudinal and cross-sectional study on N = 206 participants (104 ‘‘new-parents’’ and 102 ‘‘nonparents by choice’’) was then implemented. These results showed that individuals who became parents had lower dyadic adjustment levels than nonparents (Lrtest = 395.03; p < .001). This decline in values seemed to be more pronounced for the ‘‘affectional expression’’ subscale (b = 3.69) and suggests that in our sample the expression of love toward a partner might be particularly subject to stress due to the arrival of a child. Considering the role played in the attachment configuration of each individual, a significant effect upon InsecureGEN/InsecureSPEC individuals was found (p = .015). This then would seem to indicate that these individuals might be more vulnerable to perceiving worse adjustment levels during the transition to first-time parenthood.
2011
specific attachment, generalized attachment, dyadic adjustment, first-time parenthood
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Adjustment of Couples Following Childbirth The Role of Generalized and Specific States of Mind in an Italian Sample / Velotti, Patrizia; Rosetta, Castellano; Zavattini, Giulio Cesare. - In: EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST. - ISSN 1016-9040. - 16:1(2011), pp. 1-10. [10.1027/1016-9040/a000022]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Adjustment European.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 150.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
150.11 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/29653
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact