Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIM: Despite a similar Helicobacter pylori prevalence, peptic ulcer is more frequent in cirrhotic patients than in controls. We evaluated whether cirrhotic patients had an increased bacterial density and/or a higher prevalence of H. pylori cagA-positive strains than controls. METHODS: A total of 36 dyspeptic cirrhotic patients with H. pylori infection and 72 matched controls were enrolled. H. pylori infection was detected at histology on Giemsa staining, bacterial density was assessed using difference over baseline (DOB) values at 13C urea breath test, and cagA status was established at serology. RESULTS: Overall, both DOB values and prevalence of cagA did not significantly differ between cirrhotic patients and controls. However, peptic ulcer controls showed significantly higher DOB value (27.9 +/- 17.4 vs 19.4 +/- 9.3, respectively; P = 0.009) and cagA positive rate (85%vs 48%; P = 0.01) than non-ulcer dyspepsia patients. Although not statistically significant, a similar trend was observed in cirrhotic patients with peptic ulcer for DOB values (26.5 +/- 16.3 vs 18.3/1000 +/- 9.2, respectively; P = 0.07), whereas the cagA-positive rate was similar between peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (60%vs 50%; P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The present data showed that both bacterial density and cagA prevalence did not differ between cirrhotic patients and controls.

Helicobacter pylori density and cagA status in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study / Zullo, A; SANCHEZ METE, L; Hassan, C; Diana, F; Festuccia, F; Attili, Adolfo Francesco; Morini, S.. - In: JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 0815-9319. - STAMPA. - 19:10(2004), pp. 1174-1178. [10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03440.x]

Helicobacter pylori density and cagA status in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study.

ATTILI, Adolfo Francesco;
2004

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND AND AIM: Despite a similar Helicobacter pylori prevalence, peptic ulcer is more frequent in cirrhotic patients than in controls. We evaluated whether cirrhotic patients had an increased bacterial density and/or a higher prevalence of H. pylori cagA-positive strains than controls. METHODS: A total of 36 dyspeptic cirrhotic patients with H. pylori infection and 72 matched controls were enrolled. H. pylori infection was detected at histology on Giemsa staining, bacterial density was assessed using difference over baseline (DOB) values at 13C urea breath test, and cagA status was established at serology. RESULTS: Overall, both DOB values and prevalence of cagA did not significantly differ between cirrhotic patients and controls. However, peptic ulcer controls showed significantly higher DOB value (27.9 +/- 17.4 vs 19.4 +/- 9.3, respectively; P = 0.009) and cagA positive rate (85%vs 48%; P = 0.01) than non-ulcer dyspepsia patients. Although not statistically significant, a similar trend was observed in cirrhotic patients with peptic ulcer for DOB values (26.5 +/- 16.3 vs 18.3/1000 +/- 9.2, respectively; P = 0.07), whereas the cagA-positive rate was similar between peptic ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia patients (60%vs 50%; P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The present data showed that both bacterial density and cagA prevalence did not differ between cirrhotic patients and controls.
2004
13C urea breath test, cagA status, cirrhosis,Helicobacter pylori, peptic ulcer,serology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Helicobacter pylori density and cagA status in cirrhotic patients: a case-control study / Zullo, A; SANCHEZ METE, L; Hassan, C; Diana, F; Festuccia, F; Attili, Adolfo Francesco; Morini, S.. - In: JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY. - ISSN 0815-9319. - STAMPA. - 19:10(2004), pp. 1174-1178. [10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03440.x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/27458
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact