Music performance is characterized by complex cross-modal interactions, offering a remarkable window into training-induced long-term plasticity and multimodal integration processes. Previous research with pianists has shown that playing a musical score is affected by the concurrent presentation of musical tones. We investigated the nature of this audio-motor coupling by evaluating how congruent and incongruent cross-modal auditory cues affect motor performance at different time intervals. We found facilitation if a congruent sound preceded motor planning with a large Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA −300 and −200 ms), whereas we observed interference when an incongruent sound was presented with shorter SOAs (−200, −100 and 0 ms). Interference and facilitation, instead of developing through time as opposite effects of the same mechanism, showed dissociable time-courses suggesting their derivation from distinct processes. It seems that the motor preparation induced by the auditory cue has different consequences on motor performance according to the congruency with the future motor state the system is planning and the degree of asynchrony between the motor act and the sound presentation. The temporal dissociation we found contributes to the understanding of how perception meets action in the context of audio-motor integration.

How and when auditory action effects impair motor performance / D'Ausilio, Alessandro; Brunetti, Riccardo; Delogu, Franco; Santonico, C; Olivetti, Marta. - In: EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0014-4819. - STAMPA. - 201:(2010), pp. 323-330. [10.1007/s00221-009-2044-6]

How and when auditory action effects impair motor performance

D'AUSILIO, ALESSANDRO;BRUNETTI, RICCARDO;DELOGU, Franco;OLIVETTI, Marta
2010

Abstract

Music performance is characterized by complex cross-modal interactions, offering a remarkable window into training-induced long-term plasticity and multimodal integration processes. Previous research with pianists has shown that playing a musical score is affected by the concurrent presentation of musical tones. We investigated the nature of this audio-motor coupling by evaluating how congruent and incongruent cross-modal auditory cues affect motor performance at different time intervals. We found facilitation if a congruent sound preceded motor planning with a large Stimulus Onset Asynchrony (SOA −300 and −200 ms), whereas we observed interference when an incongruent sound was presented with shorter SOAs (−200, −100 and 0 ms). Interference and facilitation, instead of developing through time as opposite effects of the same mechanism, showed dissociable time-courses suggesting their derivation from distinct processes. It seems that the motor preparation induced by the auditory cue has different consequences on motor performance according to the congruency with the future motor state the system is planning and the degree of asynchrony between the motor act and the sound presentation. The temporal dissociation we found contributes to the understanding of how perception meets action in the context of audio-motor integration.
2010
audiomotor integration; sensorymotor; music;aAction planning; action facilitation; action interference; action perception cycle
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
How and when auditory action effects impair motor performance / D'Ausilio, Alessandro; Brunetti, Riccardo; Delogu, Franco; Santonico, C; Olivetti, Marta. - In: EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH. - ISSN 0014-4819. - STAMPA. - 201:(2010), pp. 323-330. [10.1007/s00221-009-2044-6]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DAusilio_How and when_2010.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 358.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
358.31 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/26393
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact