BACKGROUND: Round-tipped blunt needle (BN) may decrease the risk of needlestick injuries and hand contamination. We prospectively determined the incidence of glove perforations in emergency abdominal procedures and the efficacy of BN in increasing the safety for surgeons. METHODS: TWO hundred patients were randomized to undergo closure of the abdominal fascia using sharp needle (SN) or BN. Gloves were tested at the end of the procedure. RESULTS: Surgeons had 14 needlestick injuries and 76 perforations recorded in 69 pair of gloves. Sharp needles were responsible for ail injuries and 58 (76%) perforations (P <0.00004 and P <0.00001, respectively). This difference was still higher when considering the perforations related to the abdominal fascia closure (BN 7% Versus SN 50%; P <0.0006). CONCLUSION: The risk of glove perforation is sevenfold greater if SN are used. Blunt needles reduce sharp injuries and improve safety for surgeons. (C) 1996 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon / Mingoli, Andrea; Sapienza, Paolo; Giovanna, Sgarzini; Luciani, Giovanni; G., De Angelis; Flavia, Ciccarone; Modini, Claudio; Richard J., Feldhaus. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0002-9610. - STAMPA. - 172:5(1996), pp. 512-517. (Intervento presentato al convegno 48th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress tenutosi a SCOTTSDALE, AZ nel APR 28-MAY 01, 1996) [10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00238-3].

Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon

MINGOLI, Andrea;SAPIENZA, Paolo;LUCIANI, GIOVANNI;MODINI, Claudio;
1996

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Round-tipped blunt needle (BN) may decrease the risk of needlestick injuries and hand contamination. We prospectively determined the incidence of glove perforations in emergency abdominal procedures and the efficacy of BN in increasing the safety for surgeons. METHODS: TWO hundred patients were randomized to undergo closure of the abdominal fascia using sharp needle (SN) or BN. Gloves were tested at the end of the procedure. RESULTS: Surgeons had 14 needlestick injuries and 76 perforations recorded in 69 pair of gloves. Sharp needles were responsible for ail injuries and 58 (76%) perforations (P <0.00004 and P <0.00001, respectively). This difference was still higher when considering the perforations related to the abdominal fascia closure (BN 7% Versus SN 50%; P <0.0006). CONCLUSION: The risk of glove perforation is sevenfold greater if SN are used. Blunt needles reduce sharp injuries and improve safety for surgeons. (C) 1996 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.
1996
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Influence of blunt needles on surgical glove perforation and safety for the surgeon / Mingoli, Andrea; Sapienza, Paolo; Giovanna, Sgarzini; Luciani, Giovanni; G., De Angelis; Flavia, Ciccarone; Modini, Claudio; Richard J., Feldhaus. - In: THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 0002-9610. - STAMPA. - 172:5(1996), pp. 512-517. (Intervento presentato al convegno 48th Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Surgical Congress tenutosi a SCOTTSDALE, AZ nel APR 28-MAY 01, 1996) [10.1016/s0002-9610(96)00238-3].
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/257331
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 10
  • Scopus 54
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact