This paper surveys the main results appearing in the literature on the computational complexity of non-monotonic inference tasks. We not only give results about the tractability/intractability of the individual problems but we also analyze sources of complexity and explain intuitively the nature of easy/hard cases. We focus mainly on non-monotonic formalisms, like default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, closed-world reasoning, and abduction, whose relations with logic programming are clear and well studied. Complexity as well as recursion-theoretic results are surveyed.

A SURVEY OF COMPLEXITY RESULTS FOR NONMONOTONIC LOGICS / Cadoli, Marco; Schaerf, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING. - ISSN 0743-1066. - 17:2-4(1993), pp. 127-160. [10.1016/0743-1066(93)90029-g]

A SURVEY OF COMPLEXITY RESULTS FOR NONMONOTONIC LOGICS

CADOLI, Marco;SCHAERF, Marco
1993

Abstract

This paper surveys the main results appearing in the literature on the computational complexity of non-monotonic inference tasks. We not only give results about the tractability/intractability of the individual problems but we also analyze sources of complexity and explain intuitively the nature of easy/hard cases. We focus mainly on non-monotonic formalisms, like default logic, autoepistemic logic, circumscription, closed-world reasoning, and abduction, whose relations with logic programming are clear and well studied. Complexity as well as recursion-theoretic results are surveyed.
1993
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A SURVEY OF COMPLEXITY RESULTS FOR NONMONOTONIC LOGICS / Cadoli, Marco; Schaerf, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF LOGIC PROGRAMMING. - ISSN 0743-1066. - 17:2-4(1993), pp. 127-160. [10.1016/0743-1066(93)90029-g]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/256614
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 87
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 74
social impact