OBJECTIVE: To understand the role of transforming growth factor (TGF) -beta 1, -beta 2 and -beta 3 proteins and TGF-beta type I and II receptors in prostate neoplasia; to determine the correlation between expression of TGF-beta s and their relative receptors in the epithelial and stromal compartments of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate carcinoma; and to determine whether TGF-beta and TGF-beta receptor expression is associated with the grade of tumor differentiation. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty prostate neoplasms were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using anti-TGF-beta 1, -beta 2, -beta 3, -beta RI and -beta RII antibodies. RESULTS: TGF-beta and TGF-beta receptor immunoreactivity was more strongly expressed in prostate carcinoma than in PIN and BPH, and TGF-beta type I and type II receptors were less strongly expressed than TGF-beta 1-3 proteins. The difference between epithelial and stromal compartments reached significance (P < .05) for all TGF-beta isoforms and related receptors only in BPH, whereas a significant difference was found for TGF-beta protein in all grades of PIN but not for prostate carcinoma tissue. Luminal epithelial cells of BPH and PIN coexpressed all three TGF-beta isoforms and preferentially TGF-beta RII. Conversely, basal epithelial cells stained strongly for TGF-beta 1, -beta 3 and -beta RI but not for TGF-beta 2 and more strongly for TGF-beta RI than -beta RII. Linear regression showed a positive correlation between TGF-beta 1 and -beta 2, between TGF-beta 2 and -beta 3 and between TGF-beta RI and -beta RII proteins in all areas. The epithelium of Gleason score 7 tumors contained significantly higher TGF-beta 2 protein levels than Gleason score 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 tumors (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Stromal and epithelial cells of malignant and nonmalignant prostatic tumors express all three TGF-beta isoforms and their related receptors. These may act as both paracrine and autocrine factors to influence prostate function and the stromal-epithelial cell interaction. TGF-beta and -beta R immunoreactivity noted in basal cells indicates that in BPH and PIN, TGF-beta Rs and signaling pathways remain intact. The overexpression of TGF-beta proteins and underexpression of TGF-beta receptors in prostate cancer could suggest a mechanism for prostate cancer cells to escape the growth inhibitory effect of TGF-beta, thus leading to a more malignant phenotype.
Transforming growth factor-beta expression in prostatic noplasia / Cardillo, MARIA ROSARIA; Petrangeli, Elisa; Perracchio, L; Salvatori, Luisa; Ravenna, Linda Ester; DI SILVERIO, Franco. - In: ANALYTICAL AND QUANTITATIVE CYTOLOGY AND HISTOLOGY. - ISSN 0884-6812. - STAMPA. - 22:(2000), pp. 1-10.
Transforming growth factor-beta expression in prostatic noplasia
CARDILLO, MARIA ROSARIA;PETRANGELI, Elisa;SALVATORI, Luisa;RAVENNA, Linda Ester;DI SILVERIO, Franco
2000
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To understand the role of transforming growth factor (TGF) -beta 1, -beta 2 and -beta 3 proteins and TGF-beta type I and II receptors in prostate neoplasia; to determine the correlation between expression of TGF-beta s and their relative receptors in the epithelial and stromal compartments of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate carcinoma; and to determine whether TGF-beta and TGF-beta receptor expression is associated with the grade of tumor differentiation. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty prostate neoplasms were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using anti-TGF-beta 1, -beta 2, -beta 3, -beta RI and -beta RII antibodies. RESULTS: TGF-beta and TGF-beta receptor immunoreactivity was more strongly expressed in prostate carcinoma than in PIN and BPH, and TGF-beta type I and type II receptors were less strongly expressed than TGF-beta 1-3 proteins. The difference between epithelial and stromal compartments reached significance (P < .05) for all TGF-beta isoforms and related receptors only in BPH, whereas a significant difference was found for TGF-beta protein in all grades of PIN but not for prostate carcinoma tissue. Luminal epithelial cells of BPH and PIN coexpressed all three TGF-beta isoforms and preferentially TGF-beta RII. Conversely, basal epithelial cells stained strongly for TGF-beta 1, -beta 3 and -beta RI but not for TGF-beta 2 and more strongly for TGF-beta RI than -beta RII. Linear regression showed a positive correlation between TGF-beta 1 and -beta 2, between TGF-beta 2 and -beta 3 and between TGF-beta RI and -beta RII proteins in all areas. The epithelium of Gleason score 7 tumors contained significantly higher TGF-beta 2 protein levels than Gleason score 3 and 4, and 5 and 6 tumors (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Stromal and epithelial cells of malignant and nonmalignant prostatic tumors express all three TGF-beta isoforms and their related receptors. These may act as both paracrine and autocrine factors to influence prostate function and the stromal-epithelial cell interaction. TGF-beta and -beta R immunoreactivity noted in basal cells indicates that in BPH and PIN, TGF-beta Rs and signaling pathways remain intact. The overexpression of TGF-beta proteins and underexpression of TGF-beta receptors in prostate cancer could suggest a mechanism for prostate cancer cells to escape the growth inhibitory effect of TGF-beta, thus leading to a more malignant phenotype.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
