OBJECTIVE: To compare the profile of psychosocial variables in a group of oligozoospermic and normozoospermic men for assessing the hypothesis of a relationship between impaired seminal status and psychosocial factors. DESIGN: Double-blind investigation of the psychosocial differences between oligozoospermics and normozoospermics. SETTINGS: Healthy volunteers in a clinical environment. PATIENT(S): Two hundred eighty men attending their first seminal examination. INTERVENTION(S): We selected 37 oligozoospermic patients on the basis of sperm concentration and 37 normozoospermic controls for comparison. OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Differences in alexithymia (difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, externally oriented thinking), personality traits (extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism), and coping style toward stressors (task-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, avoidance-oriented coping) were assessed in the two groups. RESULT(S): Wilk's Lambda (.79) of the discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The following variables met the inclusion criterion in the discriminant function: psychoticism and difficulty describing feeling. This analysis also showed a high probability of correct classification of oligozoospermic men on the basis of the psychosocial variables. CONCLUSION(S): The relationship between psychosocial variables and seminal status has been confirmed in a group of oligozoospermic and normozoospermic men.

Psychosocial factors discriminate oligozoospermic from normozoospermic men / DE GENNARO, Luigi; Balistreri, S.; Lenzi, Andrea; Lombardo, Francesco; Ferrara, M.; Gandini, Loredana. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - 79(3):(2003), pp. 1571-1576. [10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00374-1]

Psychosocial factors discriminate oligozoospermic from normozoospermic men.

DE GENNARO, Luigi;LENZI, Andrea;LOMBARDO, Francesco;GANDINI, Loredana
2003

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the profile of psychosocial variables in a group of oligozoospermic and normozoospermic men for assessing the hypothesis of a relationship between impaired seminal status and psychosocial factors. DESIGN: Double-blind investigation of the psychosocial differences between oligozoospermics and normozoospermics. SETTINGS: Healthy volunteers in a clinical environment. PATIENT(S): Two hundred eighty men attending their first seminal examination. INTERVENTION(S): We selected 37 oligozoospermic patients on the basis of sperm concentration and 37 normozoospermic controls for comparison. OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Differences in alexithymia (difficulty identifying feelings, difficulty describing feelings, externally oriented thinking), personality traits (extroversion, neuroticism, psychoticism), and coping style toward stressors (task-oriented coping, emotion-oriented coping, avoidance-oriented coping) were assessed in the two groups. RESULT(S): Wilk's Lambda (.79) of the discriminant analysis showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups. The following variables met the inclusion criterion in the discriminant function: psychoticism and difficulty describing feeling. This analysis also showed a high probability of correct classification of oligozoospermic men on the basis of the psychosocial variables. CONCLUSION(S): The relationship between psychosocial variables and seminal status has been confirmed in a group of oligozoospermic and normozoospermic men.
2003
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Psychosocial factors discriminate oligozoospermic from normozoospermic men / DE GENNARO, Luigi; Balistreri, S.; Lenzi, Andrea; Lombardo, Francesco; Ferrara, M.; Gandini, Loredana. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - 79(3):(2003), pp. 1571-1576. [10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00374-1]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/253393
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact