The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the motor unit (MU) recruitment strategy of the agonist and antagonist muscles in the dominant arm differs from that in the non-dominant arm, The median frequency (MF) of the power density spectrum (PDS) of the electromyogram (EMG) was used as a tracking parameter to describe the MU recruitment. In 8 subjects the EMG was recorded from the biceps brachii and triceps brachii of each limb during isometric elbow flexion performed in a ramp fashion, Force was increased from 0 to 100% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in 3 s following a track displayed on an oscilloscope. When comparing the dominant versus non-dominant arm we found no statistical difference in the MU recruitment pattern of the biceps brachii and the triceps. Because the dominant arm was not always the better performing arm, we grouped the data according to the ability of the subjects to track the ramp signal. In this case we found a statistically significant difference between the better and worse performing arm in the full MU recruitment of the biceps. A more precise and accurate control of the increase in force was obtained when the central nervous system selected a slower and prolonged recruitment of MUs in the agonist muscle. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Force generation performance and motor unit recruitment strategy in muscles of contralateral limbs / Bernardi, Marco; Felici, Francesco; Marchetti, Marco; F., Montellanico; M. F., Piacentini; M., Solomonow. - In: JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY. - ISSN 1050-6411. - STAMPA. - 9:2(1999), pp. 121-130. [10.1016/s1050-6411(98)00043-1]

Force generation performance and motor unit recruitment strategy in muscles of contralateral limbs

BERNARDI, Marco;FELICI, Francesco;MARCHETTI, Marco;
1999

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the motor unit (MU) recruitment strategy of the agonist and antagonist muscles in the dominant arm differs from that in the non-dominant arm, The median frequency (MF) of the power density spectrum (PDS) of the electromyogram (EMG) was used as a tracking parameter to describe the MU recruitment. In 8 subjects the EMG was recorded from the biceps brachii and triceps brachii of each limb during isometric elbow flexion performed in a ramp fashion, Force was increased from 0 to 100% of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) in 3 s following a track displayed on an oscilloscope. When comparing the dominant versus non-dominant arm we found no statistical difference in the MU recruitment pattern of the biceps brachii and the triceps. Because the dominant arm was not always the better performing arm, we grouped the data according to the ability of the subjects to track the ramp signal. In this case we found a statistically significant difference between the better and worse performing arm in the full MU recruitment of the biceps. A more precise and accurate control of the increase in force was obtained when the central nervous system selected a slower and prolonged recruitment of MUs in the agonist muscle. (C) 1999 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
1999
dominance; electromyography; motor unit; muscle; skill
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Force generation performance and motor unit recruitment strategy in muscles of contralateral limbs / Bernardi, Marco; Felici, Francesco; Marchetti, Marco; F., Montellanico; M. F., Piacentini; M., Solomonow. - In: JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY. - ISSN 1050-6411. - STAMPA. - 9:2(1999), pp. 121-130. [10.1016/s1050-6411(98)00043-1]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/243733
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact