This article presents conceptual arguments and empirical evidence consistent with a unified conception of human judgment. It identifies several continuous parameters which intersections at specific values determine the judgmental impact of the information given. The unimodel serves as an overarching framework subsuming a plethora of theoretical notions and empirical findings related to binary distinctions between associative versus rule based, automatic versus deliberative, intuitive versus rational, heuristic versus Systematic, and central versus peripheral modes of judgment. This perspective simplifies the depiction of human judgment processes and highlights its critical determinants.
On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors / A. W., Kruglanski; H. P., Erb; Pierro, Antonio; Mannetti, Lucia; W. Y., Chun. - In: PSYCHOLOGICAL INQUIRY. - ISSN 1047-840X. - STAMPA. - 17:3(2006), pp. 153-165. [10.1207/s15327965pli1703_1]
On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors
PIERRO, Antonio;MANNETTI, Lucia;
2006
Abstract
This article presents conceptual arguments and empirical evidence consistent with a unified conception of human judgment. It identifies several continuous parameters which intersections at specific values determine the judgmental impact of the information given. The unimodel serves as an overarching framework subsuming a plethora of theoretical notions and empirical findings related to binary distinctions between associative versus rule based, automatic versus deliberative, intuitive versus rational, heuristic versus Systematic, and central versus peripheral modes of judgment. This perspective simplifies the depiction of human judgment processes and highlights its critical determinants.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
