Background/aims: To assess LDL-apheresis efficacy to lower Lp(a) and to compare the effects of Usual Medical Care (UMC) a 12-months Study was carried Out. The incidence of new coronary artery disease (CAD) events/need of revascularization, Was also monitored. Methods: Twenty-one patients with hyperLp(a)lipidemia and angiographically documented CAD were randomly assigned to LDL-apheresis every week, or the UMC. Results: LDL-apheresis grout), averaged an Lp(a) reduction of 57.8 +/- 9.5% vs. basal values (P < 0.001). In the UMC group Lp(a) increased in 1 year to 14.7 +/- 36.5% (P=0.66). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis for predictors of Lp(a) including: type of treatment, smoking, hypertension, age, age at first cardiovascular event, initial Lp(a), LEE, and BMI values, was performed. Only the type of treatment was co-related (P < 0.001): Lp(a) variation (beta) = 0.863. The model has R2 adjusted relative risk of 0.725. Conclusion: LDL-apheresis Could be the first line treatment of isolated hyperLp(a)lipidemia when CAD is established. New CAD events/cardiac interventions were not observed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Treatment of symptomatic hyperLp(a)lipidemia with LDL-apheresis vs. usual care / Stefanutti, Claudia; A., Vivenzio; DI GIACOMO, Serafina; Mazzarella, Bruno; P. M., Ferraro; S., Abbolito. - In: TRANSFUSION AND APHERESIS SCIENCE. - ISSN 1473-0502. - STAMPA. - 42:1(2010), pp. 21-26. [10.1016/j.transci.2009.10.003]
Treatment of symptomatic hyperLp(a)lipidemia with LDL-apheresis vs. usual care
STEFANUTTI, Claudia;DI GIACOMO, SERAFINA;MAZZARELLA, Bruno;
2010
Abstract
Background/aims: To assess LDL-apheresis efficacy to lower Lp(a) and to compare the effects of Usual Medical Care (UMC) a 12-months Study was carried Out. The incidence of new coronary artery disease (CAD) events/need of revascularization, Was also monitored. Methods: Twenty-one patients with hyperLp(a)lipidemia and angiographically documented CAD were randomly assigned to LDL-apheresis every week, or the UMC. Results: LDL-apheresis grout), averaged an Lp(a) reduction of 57.8 +/- 9.5% vs. basal values (P < 0.001). In the UMC group Lp(a) increased in 1 year to 14.7 +/- 36.5% (P=0.66). Stepwise multivariate regression analysis for predictors of Lp(a) including: type of treatment, smoking, hypertension, age, age at first cardiovascular event, initial Lp(a), LEE, and BMI values, was performed. Only the type of treatment was co-related (P < 0.001): Lp(a) variation (beta) = 0.863. The model has R2 adjusted relative risk of 0.725. Conclusion: LDL-apheresis Could be the first line treatment of isolated hyperLp(a)lipidemia when CAD is established. New CAD events/cardiac interventions were not observed. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
