Background and objective Inadequate postoperative pain control remains a problem for many patients undergoing surgery. This study presents subgroup analyses from a large, randomized, multicentre, European study comparing the efficacy and safety of the fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management. Methods The efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia were evaluated for patients divided by surgery type, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and type of anaesthesia used during surgery. Efficacy measures included a patient global assessment of the method of pain control (a rating of 'good' or 'excellent' was considered as a success rating) and mean last pain intensity scores in the first 24 h. Discontinuation rates and the incidence of adverse events were also evaluated. Results Numerically similar percentages of patients in most subgroups reported success on the last patient global assessment in the first 24 h for both the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Similar percentages of investigators reported success ratings on the investigator global assessment at the last assessment for both treatment groups regardless of surgery type, except for the knee surgery subgroup (fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system, 75%; morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, 95%). Mean last pain intensity scores in the first 24 h after surgery were similar in all subgroups. Rates of patient withdrawals and the incidence of adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups in the patient subgroups. Conclusion The fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia are comparably well tolerated and effective methods of pain control, regardless of sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status or the type of anaesthesia used for surgery, and following most surgery types. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:433-440

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups / Mattia, Consalvo; Coluzzi, Flaminia; Davide, Sonnino; Erling Anker, Møller. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY. - ISSN 0265-0215. - 27:5(2010), pp. 433-440. [10.1097/eja.0b013e3283349d82]

Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups

MATTIA, Consalvo;COLUZZI, FLAMINIA;
2010

Abstract

Background and objective Inadequate postoperative pain control remains a problem for many patients undergoing surgery. This study presents subgroup analyses from a large, randomized, multicentre, European study comparing the efficacy and safety of the fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management. Methods The efficacy and safety of the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia were evaluated for patients divided by surgery type, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and type of anaesthesia used during surgery. Efficacy measures included a patient global assessment of the method of pain control (a rating of 'good' or 'excellent' was considered as a success rating) and mean last pain intensity scores in the first 24 h. Discontinuation rates and the incidence of adverse events were also evaluated. Results Numerically similar percentages of patients in most subgroups reported success on the last patient global assessment in the first 24 h for both the fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Similar percentages of investigators reported success ratings on the investigator global assessment at the last assessment for both treatment groups regardless of surgery type, except for the knee surgery subgroup (fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system, 75%; morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, 95%). Mean last pain intensity scores in the first 24 h after surgery were similar in all subgroups. Rates of patient withdrawals and the incidence of adverse events were generally similar between treatment groups in the patient subgroups. Conclusion The fentanyl iontophoretic transdermal system and morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia are comparably well tolerated and effective methods of pain control, regardless of sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status or the type of anaesthesia used for surgery, and following most surgery types. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010;27:433-440
2010
administration; analgesia; cutaneous; fentanyl; infusion pumps; intravenous drug delivery systems; iontophoresis; patient-controlled; postoperative pain; transdermal administration
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Efficacy and safety of fentanyl HCl iontophoretic transdermal system compared with morphine intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain management for patient subgroups / Mattia, Consalvo; Coluzzi, Flaminia; Davide, Sonnino; Erling Anker, Møller. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY. - ISSN 0265-0215. - 27:5(2010), pp. 433-440. [10.1097/eja.0b013e3283349d82]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/229429
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact