http://metropoles.revues.org, n. 2 This article presents the results of a research on two participative practices carried out in two of Rome’s municipalities, namely Participatory Budgeting and the collection of comments on the City’s new master plan. Practices are compared through a typology based one hand on their impacts on the political and institutional systems (expressed by a «consultative vs. decisional» continuum) and on the other hand on the kinds of social interaction (“aggregative vs. deliberative”). Explanations of the differentiated nature of the analyzed practices are found in several independent variables, such as the specific public policy domain that hosts each practice, practice regulations, their creators’ and promoters’ political cultures and strategies. A final question concerns two alternative scenarios : practices of deliberative democracy may either be penned into policy niches, thus not affecting major decisions within the urban context, or be an ingredient of policies for common goods, alternative to the neo-liberal policies that have been prevailing in many cities’ agendas over the last 20 years.

“Political consequences of participative practices in an urban context : two case studies in Rome” in Métropoles (Rivista on line) http://metropoles.revues.org, n. 2 / D'Albergo, Ernesto; Moini, Giulio. - In: MÉTROPOLES. - ISSN 1957-7788. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:(2007).

“Political consequences of participative practices in an urban context : two case studies in Rome” in Métropoles (Rivista on line) http://metropoles.revues.org, n. 2

D'ALBERGO, Ernesto;MOINI, Giulio
2007

Abstract

http://metropoles.revues.org, n. 2 This article presents the results of a research on two participative practices carried out in two of Rome’s municipalities, namely Participatory Budgeting and the collection of comments on the City’s new master plan. Practices are compared through a typology based one hand on their impacts on the political and institutional systems (expressed by a «consultative vs. decisional» continuum) and on the other hand on the kinds of social interaction (“aggregative vs. deliberative”). Explanations of the differentiated nature of the analyzed practices are found in several independent variables, such as the specific public policy domain that hosts each practice, practice regulations, their creators’ and promoters’ political cultures and strategies. A final question concerns two alternative scenarios : practices of deliberative democracy may either be penned into policy niches, thus not affecting major decisions within the urban context, or be an ingredient of policies for common goods, alternative to the neo-liberal policies that have been prevailing in many cities’ agendas over the last 20 years.
2007
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
“Political consequences of participative practices in an urban context : two case studies in Rome” in Métropoles (Rivista on line) http://metropoles.revues.org, n. 2 / D'Albergo, Ernesto; Moini, Giulio. - In: MÉTROPOLES. - ISSN 1957-7788. - ELETTRONICO. - 2:(2007).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/220039
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact