The spatial variability of the earthquake strong ground motion (SVEGM) leads to significant aspects in the structural response of long-plan structures, such as long-span and medium-span bridges. The main purpose of this article is to investigate the effects of the asynchronism of the ground motion on the structural response of a medium-span cable-stayed bridge, and in doing so the SVEGM takes only into account the time delay between the arrival of the shear waves, without taking into account their incoherency. Referring to the article named "Effective framework for seismic analysis of cable-stayed bridges, pt.1: modeling of the structure and of the seismic action" (Bontempi, Sgambi, Santoboni, 2006), in which the studied structure and its modeling are discussed, once having established a list of the monitored parameters of the bridge, it has been done the evaluation of their values in a statistic way, in order to evaluate if the number of the considered seismic events may be enough to obtain reliable results. One has considered the estimation of the average, variance and standard deviation of the results of both the synchronous and asynchronous motion. Histograms have been evaluated, showing, for established intervals, the number of the registered events; the gaussian distribution has been drawn, considering the obtained values as continuous variables. The statistic reliability of the obtained results has been evaluated by the comparison of the shape of the gaussian distribution with the histograms, by the use of the parametrical χ2 Pearson's test, and doing some physical evaluations. An evaluation has been made of the differences in percentage of the averages of the maximum values reached by each monitored parameter, during the time histories, in both the cases of synchronous and asynchronous motion. Figure 1 shows these differences. Since the time delay depends on the shear wave velocity, the response of the structure under different values of the velocity has been studied with the purpose to establish the dependence between the wave velocity and the structural response and to evaluate the possible existence of a critical value, which may show a particular behavior of the structural response. With those purposes, the response of the structure has been evaluated under a range of velocity which goes from 200 m/s to 1000 m/s, even if the lower values are not compatible with a "Eurocode type A" soil, used for the evaluation of the response spectra. The main results of these studies are: 1. Neglecting the effects of asynchronous ground motion can lead to serious mistakes also into the evaluation of the structural response of medium-span bridges. Considerable differences in the observed parameters are registered only in the axial force in the middle of the longitudinal beam, with an underestimation of 60%; 2. Considering the structural response under different values of the shear wave velocity, from 200 m/s up to 1000 m/s, shows that the differences at the lower velocities are really high; the trend of the values reached by the monitored parameters shows a nonlinear behavior of the structural response; 3. The statistical evaluation of the results shows that the reliability of the results can be improved by the use of a higher number of considered events. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group.

Effective framework for seismic analysis of cable-stayed-bridges, Part 2: Analysis’ results / Sgambi, L; Bontempi, Franco; Santoboni, G.. - (2006), pp. 361-362. (Intervento presentato al convegno 3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management - Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Performance and Cost tenutosi a Porto; Portugal nel 16-19 July 2006).

Effective framework for seismic analysis of cable-stayed-bridges, Part 2: Analysis’ results

BONTEMPI, Franco;
2006

Abstract

The spatial variability of the earthquake strong ground motion (SVEGM) leads to significant aspects in the structural response of long-plan structures, such as long-span and medium-span bridges. The main purpose of this article is to investigate the effects of the asynchronism of the ground motion on the structural response of a medium-span cable-stayed bridge, and in doing so the SVEGM takes only into account the time delay between the arrival of the shear waves, without taking into account their incoherency. Referring to the article named "Effective framework for seismic analysis of cable-stayed bridges, pt.1: modeling of the structure and of the seismic action" (Bontempi, Sgambi, Santoboni, 2006), in which the studied structure and its modeling are discussed, once having established a list of the monitored parameters of the bridge, it has been done the evaluation of their values in a statistic way, in order to evaluate if the number of the considered seismic events may be enough to obtain reliable results. One has considered the estimation of the average, variance and standard deviation of the results of both the synchronous and asynchronous motion. Histograms have been evaluated, showing, for established intervals, the number of the registered events; the gaussian distribution has been drawn, considering the obtained values as continuous variables. The statistic reliability of the obtained results has been evaluated by the comparison of the shape of the gaussian distribution with the histograms, by the use of the parametrical χ2 Pearson's test, and doing some physical evaluations. An evaluation has been made of the differences in percentage of the averages of the maximum values reached by each monitored parameter, during the time histories, in both the cases of synchronous and asynchronous motion. Figure 1 shows these differences. Since the time delay depends on the shear wave velocity, the response of the structure under different values of the velocity has been studied with the purpose to establish the dependence between the wave velocity and the structural response and to evaluate the possible existence of a critical value, which may show a particular behavior of the structural response. With those purposes, the response of the structure has been evaluated under a range of velocity which goes from 200 m/s to 1000 m/s, even if the lower values are not compatible with a "Eurocode type A" soil, used for the evaluation of the response spectra. The main results of these studies are: 1. Neglecting the effects of asynchronous ground motion can lead to serious mistakes also into the evaluation of the structural response of medium-span bridges. Considerable differences in the observed parameters are registered only in the axial force in the middle of the longitudinal beam, with an underestimation of 60%; 2. Considering the structural response under different values of the shear wave velocity, from 200 m/s up to 1000 m/s, shows that the differences at the lower velocities are really high; the trend of the values reached by the monitored parameters shows a nonlinear behavior of the structural response; 3. The statistical evaluation of the results shows that the reliability of the results can be improved by the use of a higher number of considered events. © 2006 Taylor & Francis Group.
2006
3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management - Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Performance and Cost
Asynchronous motions; Axial forces; Continuous variables
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Effective framework for seismic analysis of cable-stayed-bridges, Part 2: Analysis’ results / Sgambi, L; Bontempi, Franco; Santoboni, G.. - (2006), pp. 361-362. (Intervento presentato al convegno 3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management - Bridge Maintenance, Safety, Management, Life-Cycle Performance and Cost tenutosi a Porto; Portugal nel 16-19 July 2006).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/204851
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact