Improving traffic management in case of perturbation is one of the main challenges in today’s railway research. The great majority of the existing literature proposes approaches to make centralized decisions to minimize delay propagation. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm to the same aim: we design and implement a modular process to allow trains to self-organize. This process consists in having trains identifying their neighbors, formulating traffic management hypotheses, checking their compatibility and selecting the best ones through a consensus mechanism. Finally, these hypotheses are merged into a directly applicable traffic plan. In a thorough experimental analysis on a portion of the Italian network, we compare the results of self-organization with those of a state-of-the-art centralized approach. In particular, we make this comparison mimicking a realistic deployment thanks to a closed-loop framework including a microscopic railway simulator. The results indicate that self-organization achieves better results than the centralized algorithm, specifically thanks to the definition and exploitation of the instance decomposition allowed by the proposed approach.

Self-Organizing Railway Traffic Management / Naldini, F., Oddi, F., D'Amato, L., Marlière, G., Trianni, V., Pellegrini, P.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. - ISSN 1558-0016. - (2026), pp. 1-13. [10.1109/TITS.2026.3704682]

Self-Organizing Railway Traffic Management

Fabio Oddi
Secondo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2026

Abstract

Improving traffic management in case of perturbation is one of the main challenges in today’s railway research. The great majority of the existing literature proposes approaches to make centralized decisions to minimize delay propagation. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm to the same aim: we design and implement a modular process to allow trains to self-organize. This process consists in having trains identifying their neighbors, formulating traffic management hypotheses, checking their compatibility and selecting the best ones through a consensus mechanism. Finally, these hypotheses are merged into a directly applicable traffic plan. In a thorough experimental analysis on a portion of the Italian network, we compare the results of self-organization with those of a state-of-the-art centralized approach. In particular, we make this comparison mimicking a realistic deployment thanks to a closed-loop framework including a microscopic railway simulator. The results indicate that self-organization achieves better results than the centralized algorithm, specifically thanks to the definition and exploitation of the instance decomposition allowed by the proposed approach.
2026
consensus; Railway traffic management; routing; scheduling; self-organization
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Self-Organizing Railway Traffic Management / Naldini, F., Oddi, F., D'Amato, L., Marlière, G., Trianni, V., Pellegrini, P.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. - ISSN 1558-0016. - (2026), pp. 1-13. [10.1109/TITS.2026.3704682]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Naldini_Self-Organizing_Railway_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2026.3704682
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.51 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.51 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1776487
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact