The complex relationship between climate shocks, adaptation, and migration hinders a rigorous understanding of the heterogeneous mobility outcomes of farm households exposed to climate stress. To unpack this heterogeneity, we couple causal machine learning methods, tailored to a conceptual framework bridging economic migration theory and the poverty traps literature, with longitudinal multi-topic household data from Nigeria. This approach allows us to produce fine-grained, non-parametric evidence that identifies the factors driving divergent mobility outcomes across different household groups affected by the same shocks. The estimated conditional average treatment effects suggest that key variables—pre-shock asset levels, in situ adaptive capacity, and weather exposure during the previous survey period—shape not only the magnitude but also the sign of the impact of agriculture-relevant weather anomalies on the mobility outcomes of farming households. While in situ adaptation serves as an alternative to migration, the role played by wealth constraints and multiple shock exposure is consistent with the existence of climate-induced immobility traps.
Climate-induced migration or immobility? Evidence from Nigeria / Letta, M., Montalbano, P., Paolantonio, A.. - In: WORLD DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 0305-750X. - 107546:209(2027). [10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107546]
Climate-induced migration or immobility? Evidence from Nigeria
Letta Marco
;Montalbano Pierluigi;
2027
Abstract
The complex relationship between climate shocks, adaptation, and migration hinders a rigorous understanding of the heterogeneous mobility outcomes of farm households exposed to climate stress. To unpack this heterogeneity, we couple causal machine learning methods, tailored to a conceptual framework bridging economic migration theory and the poverty traps literature, with longitudinal multi-topic household data from Nigeria. This approach allows us to produce fine-grained, non-parametric evidence that identifies the factors driving divergent mobility outcomes across different household groups affected by the same shocks. The estimated conditional average treatment effects suggest that key variables—pre-shock asset levels, in situ adaptive capacity, and weather exposure during the previous survey period—shape not only the magnitude but also the sign of the impact of agriculture-relevant weather anomalies on the mobility outcomes of farming households. While in situ adaptation serves as an alternative to migration, the role played by wealth constraints and multiple shock exposure is consistent with the existence of climate-induced immobility traps.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lettaetal_WD_2027.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
2.58 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.58 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


