Background: Consistent physical inactivity among adults and adolescents poses a major global health challenge. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions, particularly Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs), offer a promising avenue for scalable and personalized physical activity promotion. However, developing and evaluating such adaptive interventions at scale, while integrating robust behavioral science, presents methodological hurdles. Objective: The PEARL study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm, informed by health behavior change theory (COM-B), to personalize the content and timing of physical activity nudges via the Fitbit app compared to fixed and random nudging strategies, and to a control group with no nudges. Methods: We conducted a large-scale, four-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling 13,463 Fitbit users. Participants were randomized to: (1) Control (no nudges); (2) Random (random content/timing); (3) Fixed (logic based on baseline COM-B survey); and (4) RL (adaptive algorithm). The primary outcome was the change in average daily step count from baseline to 2 months. Secondary outcomes included user engagement and survey responses regarding capability, opportunity, and motivation. Results: 7,711 participants were included in the primary analysis (mean age 42.1 years; 86.3% female). At 1 month, the RL group showed a significant increase in daily steps compared to Control (+296 steps, P<.001), Random (+218 steps, P=.005), and Fixed (+238 steps, P=.002) groups. At 2 months, the RL group sustained a significant increase against the Control (+210 steps, P=.01). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models confirmed a sustained significant increase in the RL group (+208 steps, P=.002). In exit surveys, the RL group reported higher favorable responses regarding nudge customization (37%) compared to other groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and early efficacy of using RL to personalize digital health nudges at scale. While long-term retention remains a challenge, the adaptive approach outperformed static behavioral rules, showcasing the promise of dynamic personalization in a real-world mHealth setting. Clinical Trial: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TW7UP
A Personalized Exercise Assistant using Reinforcement Learning (PEARL): Results from a Large-Scale Mobile Health Randomized-Controlled Trial / Armento Lee, A., Hegde, N., Deliu, N., Rosenzweig, E., Suggala, A., Lakshminarasimhan, S., He, Q., Hernandez, J., Seneviratne, M., Singh, R., Kalkar, P., Shanmugam, K., Raghuveer, A., Singh, A., Manoharan, H., Nguyen, M.y., Taylor, J., Alla, J., Villar, S.S., Emir-Farinas, H.. - In: JMIR. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH. - ISSN 1438-8871. - (2026). [10.2196/91156]
A Personalized Exercise Assistant using Reinforcement Learning (PEARL): Results from a Large-Scale Mobile Health Randomized-Controlled Trial
Deliu, NinaMethodology
;
2026
Abstract
Background: Consistent physical inactivity among adults and adolescents poses a major global health challenge. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions, particularly Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions (JITAIs), offer a promising avenue for scalable and personalized physical activity promotion. However, developing and evaluating such adaptive interventions at scale, while integrating robust behavioral science, presents methodological hurdles. Objective: The PEARL study aimed to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm, informed by health behavior change theory (COM-B), to personalize the content and timing of physical activity nudges via the Fitbit app compared to fixed and random nudging strategies, and to a control group with no nudges. Methods: We conducted a large-scale, four-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolling 13,463 Fitbit users. Participants were randomized to: (1) Control (no nudges); (2) Random (random content/timing); (3) Fixed (logic based on baseline COM-B survey); and (4) RL (adaptive algorithm). The primary outcome was the change in average daily step count from baseline to 2 months. Secondary outcomes included user engagement and survey responses regarding capability, opportunity, and motivation. Results: 7,711 participants were included in the primary analysis (mean age 42.1 years; 86.3% female). At 1 month, the RL group showed a significant increase in daily steps compared to Control (+296 steps, P<.001), Random (+218 steps, P=.005), and Fixed (+238 steps, P=.002) groups. At 2 months, the RL group sustained a significant increase against the Control (+210 steps, P=.01). Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models confirmed a sustained significant increase in the RL group (+208 steps, P=.002). In exit surveys, the RL group reported higher favorable responses regarding nudge customization (37%) compared to other groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility and early efficacy of using RL to personalize digital health nudges at scale. While long-term retention remains a challenge, the adaptive approach outperformed static behavioral rules, showcasing the promise of dynamic personalization in a real-world mHealth setting. Clinical Trial: doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/TW7UPI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


