This essay analyses the persistence and transformation of the classical architectural language between the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, demonstrating how classicism continues to serve as an instrument of cultural identity and political legitimisation. Through a selection of case studies, the text reconstructs the use of idioms inspired by Greco-Roman antiquity in major public and monumental works, spanning Euro- American New Classical Architecture and a now globalised dimension across diverse contexts. Particular attention is paid to modern triumphal arches and monumentalisation projects in the capitals of emerging nations, highlighting the recourse to the classical repertoire as a symbol of prestige and state legitimisation. The essay underscores the tension between an avowedly ‘official’ classicism – an expression of official culture and politics – and its ‘vernacular’ or ‘kitsch’ adaptations. Through comparative analysis, it argues that contemporary classicism is not a mere return to a formal language, but a global phenomenon arising from complex dynamics between historical continuity and rupture, multinational entrepreneurship, and sophisticated communication strategies.

Classicismi contemporanei tra kitsch e monumentalità (con Federico Marcomini), in “Studi e ricerche di storia dell’architettura”, 19, 2026, pp. 133-149 (https://www.aistarch.org/studi-e-ricerche-di-storia-dellarchitettura-numero-19-2026/) / Bevilacqua, M.. - In: STUDI E RICERCHE DI STORIA DELL'ARCHITETTURA. - ISSN 2532-2699. - (2026), pp. 133-149. [10.6093/2532-2699/13433]

Classicismi contemporanei tra kitsch e monumentalità (con Federico Marcomini), in “Studi e ricerche di storia dell’architettura”, 19, 2026, pp. 133-149 (https://www.aistarch.org/studi-e-ricerche-di-storia-dellarchitettura-numero-19-2026/)

Mario Bevilacqua
2026

Abstract

This essay analyses the persistence and transformation of the classical architectural language between the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, demonstrating how classicism continues to serve as an instrument of cultural identity and political legitimisation. Through a selection of case studies, the text reconstructs the use of idioms inspired by Greco-Roman antiquity in major public and monumental works, spanning Euro- American New Classical Architecture and a now globalised dimension across diverse contexts. Particular attention is paid to modern triumphal arches and monumentalisation projects in the capitals of emerging nations, highlighting the recourse to the classical repertoire as a symbol of prestige and state legitimisation. The essay underscores the tension between an avowedly ‘official’ classicism – an expression of official culture and politics – and its ‘vernacular’ or ‘kitsch’ adaptations. Through comparative analysis, it argues that contemporary classicism is not a mere return to a formal language, but a global phenomenon arising from complex dynamics between historical continuity and rupture, multinational entrepreneurship, and sophisticated communication strategies.
2026
linguaggio classico dell'architettura; classicismi; architettura del XXI secolo
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Classicismi contemporanei tra kitsch e monumentalità (con Federico Marcomini), in “Studi e ricerche di storia dell’architettura”, 19, 2026, pp. 133-149 (https://www.aistarch.org/studi-e-ricerche-di-storia-dellarchitettura-numero-19-2026/) / Bevilacqua, M.. - In: STUDI E RICERCHE DI STORIA DELL'ARCHITETTURA. - ISSN 2532-2699. - (2026), pp. 133-149. [10.6093/2532-2699/13433]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1773224
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact