We study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) over a convex set K⸦ℝd, where in each round t the learner selects xtK and then observes a convex loss ft:K[0,1], with the goal of minimizing regret to the best fixed decision in hindsight. We introduce a unified probing model that generalizes two recent lines of work: sublinear best-expert queries in the experts setting (Russo et al., 2024), and pairwise (comparison-based) feedback available every round in OCO (Bhaskara et al., 2023b). In our framework, the learner has a budget of kT pairwise probes; on a probed round it may query two points and learn which one has smaller loss. Our main result shows that even a sublinear and noisy probe budget can provably improve worst-case regret in the full feedback OCO regime. With k 5-noisy pairwise probes, we obtainREGT O(min{dTlnT,dTlnT/k|1-2δ\}), which is tight (up to logarithmic factors in T) across T, k and δ. Specifically regarding the noise parameter δϵ [0,1], the regret guarantee smoothly degrades as the oracle response approaches a coin flip, i.e., δ is close to 1/2. When applying the same techniques to a finite K for the prediction with d experts setting, the resulting rates are instead completely tight in all parameters, including d. Our analysis gives a streamlined treatment of pairwise probing in OCO by quantifying the benefit of probing via a variance reduction effect, combined with a second-order (variance-based) analysis of Continuous Exponential Weights (Bubeck, 2011; de Rooij et al., 2014).

Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes / Di Gregorio, S., Gupta, A., Leonardi, S., Russo, M.. - 336:(2026). (39th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2026 San Diego; Stati Uniti ).

Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes

Di Gregorio Simone
;
Leonardi Stefano;Russo Matteo
2026

Abstract

We study Online Convex Optimization (OCO) over a convex set K⸦ℝd, where in each round t the learner selects xtK and then observes a convex loss ft:K[0,1], with the goal of minimizing regret to the best fixed decision in hindsight. We introduce a unified probing model that generalizes two recent lines of work: sublinear best-expert queries in the experts setting (Russo et al., 2024), and pairwise (comparison-based) feedback available every round in OCO (Bhaskara et al., 2023b). In our framework, the learner has a budget of kT pairwise probes; on a probed round it may query two points and learn which one has smaller loss. Our main result shows that even a sublinear and noisy probe budget can provably improve worst-case regret in the full feedback OCO regime. With k 5-noisy pairwise probes, we obtainREGT O(min{dTlnT,dTlnT/k|1-2δ\}), which is tight (up to logarithmic factors in T) across T, k and δ. Specifically regarding the noise parameter δϵ [0,1], the regret guarantee smoothly degrades as the oracle response approaches a coin flip, i.e., δ is close to 1/2. When applying the same techniques to a finite K for the prediction with d experts setting, the resulting rates are instead completely tight in all parameters, including d. Our analysis gives a streamlined treatment of pairwise probing in OCO by quantifying the benefit of probing via a variance reduction effect, combined with a second-order (variance-based) analysis of Continuous Exponential Weights (Bubeck, 2011; de Rooij et al., 2014).
2026
39th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2026
Noisy Probes; Online Convex Optimization; Prediction with Expert Advice
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Online Convex Optimization with Sublinear Noisy Probes / Di Gregorio, S., Gupta, A., Leonardi, S., Russo, M.. - 336:(2026). (39th Annual Conference on Learning Theory, COLT 2026 San Diego; Stati Uniti ).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1772943
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact