Purpose: Children with inner ear malformations, particularlyIncomplete Partition Type II (IP-II), often exhibit variability in auditory and cognitive outcomes despite receiving appropriate rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare phoneme discrimination, executive functions, verbal memory, and hearing-related quality of life in children with IP-II using cochlear implants against peers with normal cochlear anatomy (using hearing aids or implants) and normal hearing. Methods: Fifty-eight children (aged 7-10 years) were divided into four groups: hearing aid users (HA), cochlear implant users with normal anatomy (CI), CI users with IP-II(CI), and normal-hearing controls. The test battery included the Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation (ASSE), Stroop Test, Working Memory Scale, and HEAR-QL-26. Regression analyses examined predictors of cognitive outcomes. Results: Phoneme discrimination accuracy differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with the IP-II(CI) group demonstrating the lowest performance. Verbal memory levels also differed significantly (p = 0.014), with the HA group showing a notably higher proportion of "very low" performance. While no significant differences were found in Stroop performance, descriptively longer completion times were observed in hearing-impaired groups. Quality of life scores were significantly lower in all hearing-impaired groups (p < 0.01). Regression analyses indicated that duration of device use was a significant predictor of interference control (Stroop Level 5: β=-0.45,p = 0.002). Conclusion: Children with IP-II exhibit reduced phoneme discrimination and verbal memory vulnerabilities despite comparable aided thresholds. These findings highlight the necessity of incorporating phoneme-level and cognitive assessments into routine follow-up, as audiological measures alone may underestimate functional listening challenges.
Auditory and cognitive outcomes in children with incomplete partition type II: A comparison with normal cochlear anatomy / Demirtaş Yılmaz, B., Özbal Batuk, M., Dincer D'Alessandro, H., Sennaroğlu, G.. - In: EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK. - ISSN 1434-4726. - (2026), pp. 1-10. [10.1007/s00405-026-10489-1]
Auditory and cognitive outcomes in children with incomplete partition type II: A comparison with normal cochlear anatomy
Hilal Dincer D'AlessandroPenultimo
;
2026
Abstract
Purpose: Children with inner ear malformations, particularlyIncomplete Partition Type II (IP-II), often exhibit variability in auditory and cognitive outcomes despite receiving appropriate rehabilitation. This study aimed to compare phoneme discrimination, executive functions, verbal memory, and hearing-related quality of life in children with IP-II using cochlear implants against peers with normal cochlear anatomy (using hearing aids or implants) and normal hearing. Methods: Fifty-eight children (aged 7-10 years) were divided into four groups: hearing aid users (HA), cochlear implant users with normal anatomy (CI), CI users with IP-II(CI), and normal-hearing controls. The test battery included the Auditory Speech Sound Evaluation (ASSE), Stroop Test, Working Memory Scale, and HEAR-QL-26. Regression analyses examined predictors of cognitive outcomes. Results: Phoneme discrimination accuracy differed significantly among groups (p < 0.001), with the IP-II(CI) group demonstrating the lowest performance. Verbal memory levels also differed significantly (p = 0.014), with the HA group showing a notably higher proportion of "very low" performance. While no significant differences were found in Stroop performance, descriptively longer completion times were observed in hearing-impaired groups. Quality of life scores were significantly lower in all hearing-impaired groups (p < 0.01). Regression analyses indicated that duration of device use was a significant predictor of interference control (Stroop Level 5: β=-0.45,p = 0.002). Conclusion: Children with IP-II exhibit reduced phoneme discrimination and verbal memory vulnerabilities despite comparable aided thresholds. These findings highlight the necessity of incorporating phoneme-level and cognitive assessments into routine follow-up, as audiological measures alone may underestimate functional listening challenges.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Yılmaz_Auditory and cognitive_2026.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
680.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
680.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


