This study explores how enabling and participatory governance architectures foster innovation in the cultural sector. It assesses whether the Commons-Enabling Institutional Ecosystem (CEIE)—an original framework developed by the authors—can support the design and interpretation of Special Public-Private Partnerships (SPPPs) introduced by Legislative Decree 36/2023. The study adopts a conceptual-abductive approach combined with a comparative qualitative analysis of two SPPPs in Central and Southern Italy, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with institutional and civic stakeholders. Preliminary results suggest that SPPPs can function as adaptive ecosystems in which public, private, and civic actors co-produce public value through distributed leadership, trust-based collaboration, and responsible innovation. Findings highlight the need for enabling institutional frameworks, impact-oriented evaluation systems, and new capabilities to support co-design and hybrid cultural governance. The exploratory and context-bound nature of the cases represents the main limitation, calling for broader empirical validation in diverse geographic or institutional settings. The study proposes an integrated framework linking commons-based governance, hybrid partnerships, and public entrepreneurship.

Participatory governance and public-private partnership forms in cultural heritage management: strategy, organization and innovation / Muraglia, G., Cicellin, M., Scuotto, A., Consiglio, S.. - (2026), pp. 1734-1749. (XLI Convegno Nazionale AIDEA: Le Intelligenze Aziendali per la competitività sostenibile e il bene comune Milan, Italy ).

Participatory governance and public-private partnership forms in cultural heritage management: strategy, organization and innovation

GIOVANNA MURAGLIA;
2026

Abstract

This study explores how enabling and participatory governance architectures foster innovation in the cultural sector. It assesses whether the Commons-Enabling Institutional Ecosystem (CEIE)—an original framework developed by the authors—can support the design and interpretation of Special Public-Private Partnerships (SPPPs) introduced by Legislative Decree 36/2023. The study adopts a conceptual-abductive approach combined with a comparative qualitative analysis of two SPPPs in Central and Southern Italy, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with institutional and civic stakeholders. Preliminary results suggest that SPPPs can function as adaptive ecosystems in which public, private, and civic actors co-produce public value through distributed leadership, trust-based collaboration, and responsible innovation. Findings highlight the need for enabling institutional frameworks, impact-oriented evaluation systems, and new capabilities to support co-design and hybrid cultural governance. The exploratory and context-bound nature of the cases represents the main limitation, calling for broader empirical validation in diverse geographic or institutional settings. The study proposes an integrated framework linking commons-based governance, hybrid partnerships, and public entrepreneurship.
2026
XLI Convegno Nazionale AIDEA: Le Intelligenze Aziendali per la competitività sostenibile e il bene comune
Cultural Heritage; Hybrid governance models; Enabling organization; Special Public-Private Partnership; Public Entrepreneurship
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Participatory governance and public-private partnership forms in cultural heritage management: strategy, organization and innovation / Muraglia, G., Cicellin, M., Scuotto, A., Consiglio, S.. - (2026), pp. 1734-1749. (XLI Convegno Nazionale AIDEA: Le Intelligenze Aziendali per la competitività sostenibile e il bene comune Milan, Italy ).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1772466
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact