Background: Mandibular third molars (MTMs) are the most frequently impacted teeth and a common indication for oral surgery. Anatomical root variations can complicate extractions and increase intra- and postoperative risks. Methods: This narrative review analyzes the most frequent MTM root anomalies—supernumerary roots, fusion, taurodontism, C-shaped canals, hypercementosis, and apical dilacerations—focusing on their clinical implications and the diagnostic role of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Results: Root anomalies markedly influence surgical complexity. Supernumerary roots and fusions may hinder elevator use and require modified sectioning. Taurodontism and hypercementosis prolong procedures and increase incomplete extraction risk. C-shaped canals and severe apical curvatures raise the likelihood of root fracture, displacement, or nerve injury. Panoramic radiographs, though common, provide limited two-dimensional detail and may underestimate anomalies. CBCT, by contrast, offers three-dimensional visualization, enhancing diagnosis, planning, and safety. Conclusions: Knowledge of MTM root anomalies, combined with selective CBCT use, is essential for optimizing surgical strategies, minimizing complications, and improving outcomes.
Radicular Aberrations of Mandibular Third Molars: Relevance for Oral Surgery—A Comprehensive Narrative Review / Zaccheo, F., Petroni, G., Cicconetti, A.. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 15:23(2025). [10.3390/app152312756]
Radicular Aberrations of Mandibular Third Molars: Relevance for Oral Surgery—A Comprehensive Narrative Review
Fabrizio Zaccheo;Giulia Petroni
;Andrea Cicconetti
2025
Abstract
Background: Mandibular third molars (MTMs) are the most frequently impacted teeth and a common indication for oral surgery. Anatomical root variations can complicate extractions and increase intra- and postoperative risks. Methods: This narrative review analyzes the most frequent MTM root anomalies—supernumerary roots, fusion, taurodontism, C-shaped canals, hypercementosis, and apical dilacerations—focusing on their clinical implications and the diagnostic role of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Results: Root anomalies markedly influence surgical complexity. Supernumerary roots and fusions may hinder elevator use and require modified sectioning. Taurodontism and hypercementosis prolong procedures and increase incomplete extraction risk. C-shaped canals and severe apical curvatures raise the likelihood of root fracture, displacement, or nerve injury. Panoramic radiographs, though common, provide limited two-dimensional detail and may underestimate anomalies. CBCT, by contrast, offers three-dimensional visualization, enhancing diagnosis, planning, and safety. Conclusions: Knowledge of MTM root anomalies, combined with selective CBCT use, is essential for optimizing surgical strategies, minimizing complications, and improving outcomes.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


