First-pass effect after acute basilar artery occlusion: a comparison of mechanical thrombectomy techniques

Background Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is effective for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO), but the optimal technique for rapid recanalization and improved outcomes remains unclear. Objective We compared stent retriever (SR), contactaspiration (CA), and combined SR plus CA techniques as first-line approaches during MT for BAO. Methods We emulated a hypothetical trial comparing CA, SR, and combined technique as first-line in BAO patients. The primary outcome was first-pass effect (FPE), defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3 with one pass of MT. Secondary outcomes included modified FPE (mFPE), functional outcome at 90 days, successful recanalization, and safety outcomes. We used inverse probability weighting (IPW) adjusted for prespecified covariates. Results The study included 960 BAO patients: 570 treated with CA, 268 with SR, and 122 with combined technique as the first approach. After applying IPW, SR was associated with lower odds of FPE (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.90) and of mFPE (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.70) compared with CA. No differences were found between the combined technique and either SR or CA. A 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–3 after mFPE was less frequent with SR (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.85) and with combined technique (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.89) compared with CA. Additionally, combined technique showed lower odds of mRS 0–1 at 90 days compared with CA (aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.94). Conclusions In BAO patients, CA was more effective than SR for complete and successful recanalization after first pass and resulted in better outcomes after mFPE as compared with other techniques. Less traumatic approaches might be preferred as first-line in BAO.