Since its publication in 1989, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) has become one of the most widely used self-report instruments in sleep medicine. Despite its enduring popularity, its extensive adoption has been accompanied by conceptual and methodological concerns regarding its psychometric foundations and the construct it purports to measure. This review offers a critical appraisal of the PSQI nearly four decades after its introduction and outlines directions for its contemporary use. Five interrelated issues are examined: (i) the absence of a clearly specified construct model of “sleep quality”; (ii) the frequent use of the PSQI as a proxy for insomnia or sleep disturbance; (iii) the interpretive fragility of the conventional global score cutoff (>5); (iv) heterogeneity in component scoring logic and instability of factorial structure; and (v) the redundancy and recall vulnerability of retrospective sleep continuity estimates. Drawing on the shift from “sleep quality” toward multidimensional sleep health, we propose reframing PSQI outputs within a theoretically grounded sleep health perspective. Accordingly, alternative strategies for scoring, reporting, and interpretation are discussed to preserve the value of this legacy instrument while improving its conceptual alignment with contemporary models of sleep assessment.

Thirty-five years of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a critical appraisal and a path forward for its contemporary use / Carpi, M., Dias, S.F., Marques, D.R., Liguori, C.. - In: SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS. - ISSN 1087-0792. - 89:(2026), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.smrv.2026.102326]

Thirty-five years of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a critical appraisal and a path forward for its contemporary use

Carpi, Matteo
Primo
;
2026

Abstract

Since its publication in 1989, the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) has become one of the most widely used self-report instruments in sleep medicine. Despite its enduring popularity, its extensive adoption has been accompanied by conceptual and methodological concerns regarding its psychometric foundations and the construct it purports to measure. This review offers a critical appraisal of the PSQI nearly four decades after its introduction and outlines directions for its contemporary use. Five interrelated issues are examined: (i) the absence of a clearly specified construct model of “sleep quality”; (ii) the frequent use of the PSQI as a proxy for insomnia or sleep disturbance; (iii) the interpretive fragility of the conventional global score cutoff (>5); (iv) heterogeneity in component scoring logic and instability of factorial structure; and (v) the redundancy and recall vulnerability of retrospective sleep continuity estimates. Drawing on the shift from “sleep quality” toward multidimensional sleep health, we propose reframing PSQI outputs within a theoretically grounded sleep health perspective. Accordingly, alternative strategies for scoring, reporting, and interpretation are discussed to preserve the value of this legacy instrument while improving its conceptual alignment with contemporary models of sleep assessment.
2026
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI); sleep quality; sleep health; clinical assessment; psychometrics; self-report scales
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
Thirty-five years of the Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a critical appraisal and a path forward for its contemporary use / Carpi, M., Dias, S.F., Marques, D.R., Liguori, C.. - In: SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS. - ISSN 1087-0792. - 89:(2026), pp. 1-11. [10.1016/j.smrv.2026.102326]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Carpi_Thirty-five-years_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.79 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1769929
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact