: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) clonality assessment has the potential to overcome the conventional limitations of PCR-based methods. This study aimed at comparing the performance and concordance of the EuroClonality-NGS approach and the LymphoTrack® Dx assay for immunoglobulin (IG)/T-cell receptor (TR)-marker identification at diagnosis. Across four quality-control rounds, six Italian laboratories analyzed 23 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and five chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cases. Overall, 171 rearrangements were identified; 80.7% were detected by both methods. Among shared targets, the concordance was 89.1%, with a higher agreement for IG (IGH 100%-IGK 92.1%) than for TR loci (TRG 78.9%-TRB 81.8%). Bland-Altman analysis indicated no statistically significant systematic bias between methods [mean bias 1.99% (95% CI: -5.29 to +1.31%)]. The Spearman correlation was ρ = 0.680 (p < 0.001). Discordances (10.9%) rarely yielded suitable sensitive PCR assays for disease monitoring (20%) and were never the sole marker in individual patients. In larger independent cohorts, similar rates of no-marker cases were observed (~4-5% in adults), with higher frequencies in T-ALL and no association with blast percentage (Spearman's ρ = 0.447, p = 0.450 in adults and ρ = 0.700, p = 0.188 in childhood). These findings support the reliability of both methods for diagnostic screening, while highlighting locus-specific variability and the importance of multi-target identification.
Comparative Analysis Between the EuroClonality-NGS Approach and the LymphoTrack® Dx Assay for IG/TR Marker Screening in Lymphoid Leukemias: A Campus ALL Study / Della Starza, I., Bellomarino, V., Di Trani, M., Cappelli, L.V., Spinelli, O., Cavagna, R., Tosi, M., Terragna, C., Armuzzi, S., Robustelli, V., Taurisano, B., Santoro, A., Salemi, D., Izzo, B., Errichiello, S., Galdiero, A., Visconti, R., Quarantelli, F., Potenza, A., Francesca Caradonna, M., et al.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES. - ISSN 1422-0067. - 27:11(2026). [10.3390/ijms27115115]
Comparative Analysis Between the EuroClonality-NGS Approach and the LymphoTrack® Dx Assay for IG/TR Marker Screening in Lymphoid Leukemias: A Campus ALL Study
Irene Della Starza;Vittorio Bellomarino;Mariangela Di Trani;Luca Vincenzo Cappelli;Alessandra Santoro;Roberta Visconti;Deborah Cardinali;Francesca Kaiser;Ilaria D'Antuono;Sabina Chiaretti;Anna Guarini;Robin Foà
2026
Abstract
: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) clonality assessment has the potential to overcome the conventional limitations of PCR-based methods. This study aimed at comparing the performance and concordance of the EuroClonality-NGS approach and the LymphoTrack® Dx assay for immunoglobulin (IG)/T-cell receptor (TR)-marker identification at diagnosis. Across four quality-control rounds, six Italian laboratories analyzed 23 acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and five chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cases. Overall, 171 rearrangements were identified; 80.7% were detected by both methods. Among shared targets, the concordance was 89.1%, with a higher agreement for IG (IGH 100%-IGK 92.1%) than for TR loci (TRG 78.9%-TRB 81.8%). Bland-Altman analysis indicated no statistically significant systematic bias between methods [mean bias 1.99% (95% CI: -5.29 to +1.31%)]. The Spearman correlation was ρ = 0.680 (p < 0.001). Discordances (10.9%) rarely yielded suitable sensitive PCR assays for disease monitoring (20%) and were never the sole marker in individual patients. In larger independent cohorts, similar rates of no-marker cases were observed (~4-5% in adults), with higher frequencies in T-ALL and no association with blast percentage (Spearman's ρ = 0.447, p = 0.450 in adults and ρ = 0.700, p = 0.188 in childhood). These findings support the reliability of both methods for diagnostic screening, while highlighting locus-specific variability and the importance of multi-target identification.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


