Drawing on the conception of law as an intersubjective communication developed by Francesco Gentile, this article explores the impact of algorithmic systems on the legal order. It argues that artificial intelligence does not simply introduce new tools, but rather intensifies a tendency already inherent in modernity: the progressive formalization of legal decision-making. Engaging with Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law and with Jü rgen Habermas’s distinction between instrumental and communicative rationality, the article shows how algorithmic reasoning tends to displace prudential judgment with procedural logic, thereby narrowing the scope for interpretation, responsibility, and attribution. From this perspective, the central risk lies not so much in the possibility of error in automated decisions, but in the transformation of law into a regulatory apparatus without interlocutors. The challenge posed by artificial intelligence to law thus emerges not as a merely technical issue, but as one that concerns the very nature of legality itself, understood as a relational practice grounded in mutual recognition between subjects.
Il diritto nell’epoca degli algoritmi. Il pensiero giuridico di Francesco Gentile tra controllo sociale e comunicazione intersoggettiva / Recanati, F., Franzese, L.. - In: IRCOCERVO. - ISSN 1722-392X. - 1(2026), pp. 174-187. [10.57581/LIRCOCERVO.25.2026.1.10]
Il diritto nell’epoca degli algoritmi. Il pensiero giuridico di Francesco Gentile tra controllo sociale e comunicazione intersoggettiva
Francesco Recanati;
2026
Abstract
Drawing on the conception of law as an intersubjective communication developed by Francesco Gentile, this article explores the impact of algorithmic systems on the legal order. It argues that artificial intelligence does not simply introduce new tools, but rather intensifies a tendency already inherent in modernity: the progressive formalization of legal decision-making. Engaging with Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law and with Jü rgen Habermas’s distinction between instrumental and communicative rationality, the article shows how algorithmic reasoning tends to displace prudential judgment with procedural logic, thereby narrowing the scope for interpretation, responsibility, and attribution. From this perspective, the central risk lies not so much in the possibility of error in automated decisions, but in the transformation of law into a regulatory apparatus without interlocutors. The challenge posed by artificial intelligence to law thus emerges not as a merely technical issue, but as one that concerns the very nature of legality itself, understood as a relational practice grounded in mutual recognition between subjects.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Recanati_Diritto_2026.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.99 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.99 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


