Background/Objectives: This study investigated auditory perception and psychosocial well-being in long-term cochlear implant (CI) users, with a particular focus on the effects of auditory (re)habilitation on learned helplessness and speech-in-noise perception, represent ing everyday listening performance. Methods: Thirty CI users and thirty peers with typical hearing (TH) participated in the study. Speech perception was assessed using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Matrix Test in both quiet and noisy listening conditions. Psychosocial status was evaluated using the Learned Helplessness Scale (LHS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Perceived hearing quality was evaluated using the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI). Results: CI users showed significantly poorer speech perception performance than TH participants (p < 0.05), whereas between-group psychosocial outcomes, including LHS, BDI, and BAI scores, did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between Matrix and HINT scores in quiet and noisy conditions. Positive associations were also ob served between CI hearing thresholds and HINT/Matrix results in noisy conditions. Within the prelingually deaf CI subgroup, age at implantation was correlated with CI thresholds, as well as with speech perception performance across both tests (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although CI users showed significantly poorer speech perception performance, their lev els of learned helplessness, depression, and anxiety were comparable to those of their THpeers. These results suggest auditory benefits following long-term CI rehabilitation, while psychosocial status appears to be within a typical range despite persistent listening difficulties in daily life.
Auditory perception and psychosocial well-being in long-term cochlear implant users / Guney, K., Ozlemtopcu, ., Mancini, P., Dincer D'Alessandro, H.. - In: AUDIOLOGY RESEARCH. - ISSN 2039-4349. - 16:3(2026), pp. 1-13. [10.3390/audiolres16030083]
Auditory perception and psychosocial well-being in long-term cochlear implant users
Patrizia ManciniPenultimo
;Hilal Dincer D’Alessandro
Ultimo
2026
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study investigated auditory perception and psychosocial well-being in long-term cochlear implant (CI) users, with a particular focus on the effects of auditory (re)habilitation on learned helplessness and speech-in-noise perception, represent ing everyday listening performance. Methods: Thirty CI users and thirty peers with typical hearing (TH) participated in the study. Speech perception was assessed using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and the Matrix Test in both quiet and noisy listening conditions. Psychosocial status was evaluated using the Learned Helplessness Scale (LHS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Perceived hearing quality was evaluated using the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI). Results: CI users showed significantly poorer speech perception performance than TH participants (p < 0.05), whereas between-group psychosocial outcomes, including LHS, BDI, and BAI scores, did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Positive correlations were observed between Matrix and HINT scores in quiet and noisy conditions. Positive associations were also ob served between CI hearing thresholds and HINT/Matrix results in noisy conditions. Within the prelingually deaf CI subgroup, age at implantation was correlated with CI thresholds, as well as with speech perception performance across both tests (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Although CI users showed significantly poorer speech perception performance, their lev els of learned helplessness, depression, and anxiety were comparable to those of their THpeers. These results suggest auditory benefits following long-term CI rehabilitation, while psychosocial status appears to be within a typical range despite persistent listening difficulties in daily life.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Guney_Auditory perception_2026.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
515.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
515.69 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


