This editorial introduces the special issue by reframing professions as gendered and intersectional sites where professional legitimacy is sought under unequal conditions. Building on the sociology of professions, feminist scholarship, and intersectional theory, it defines professional legitimacy as a relational status granted within specific institutional, organizational, and geopolitical settings. The main argument is that professional legitimacy cannot be understood as the neutral outcome of formal professionalization. Rather, it is shaped by unequal access to legitimating resources, organizational routines that filter professional worth, and individualized trajectories of recognition. Bringing together contributions from different professional fields and socio-geographical contexts, the issue highlights how legitimacy is negotiated through everyday practices, institutional arrangements, and broader power relations. Reading the contributions across the Global North–Global South axis, the editorial shows how gendered and intersectional inequalities affect the terms under which professional claims become credible or remain fragile. In doing so, it outlines an agenda for studying the uneven routes through which work becomes professionally legitimate and socially recognized.
Professions and professionalism from a gendered perspective in the Global North and the Global South / Lucciarini, Silvia; Bellini, Andrea. - In: JOURNAL OF GENDER STUDIES. - ISSN 0958-9236. - (2026), pp. 1-15. [10.1080/09589236.2026.2673120]
Professions and professionalism from a gendered perspective in the Global North and the Global South
Lucciarini, Silvia
Primo
;Bellini, AndreaSecondo
2026
Abstract
This editorial introduces the special issue by reframing professions as gendered and intersectional sites where professional legitimacy is sought under unequal conditions. Building on the sociology of professions, feminist scholarship, and intersectional theory, it defines professional legitimacy as a relational status granted within specific institutional, organizational, and geopolitical settings. The main argument is that professional legitimacy cannot be understood as the neutral outcome of formal professionalization. Rather, it is shaped by unequal access to legitimating resources, organizational routines that filter professional worth, and individualized trajectories of recognition. Bringing together contributions from different professional fields and socio-geographical contexts, the issue highlights how legitimacy is negotiated through everyday practices, institutional arrangements, and broader power relations. Reading the contributions across the Global North–Global South axis, the editorial shows how gendered and intersectional inequalities affect the terms under which professional claims become credible or remain fragile. In doing so, it outlines an agenda for studying the uneven routes through which work becomes professionally legitimate and socially recognized.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Professions and professionalism from a gendered perspective in the Global North and the Global South.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
599.27 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
599.27 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


