The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has raised critical questions about their impact on student well-being. This study examines the relationship between AI tool usage and well-being, with self-efficacy as a moderating variable. Grounded in positive psychology, the research differentiates between hedonic well-being, associated with immediate pleasure and life satisfaction, and eudaimonic well-being, which reflects personal growth and self-actualization. Results indicate that AI tool usage negatively affects hedonic well-being unless moderated by high self-efficacy, which enables students to derive greater satisfaction from AI-assisted learning. Conversely, AI tool usage alone does not significantly influence eudaimonic well-being, but when self-efficacy is high, students experience enhanced psychological flourishing. These findings highlight self-efficacy as a crucial determinant in maximizing AI’s benefits, shaping students’ ability to transform technology into a tool for both subjective happiness and long-term self- development. This study underscores the importance of analyzing the distinct effects of AI on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, as their underlying mechanisms differ. The insights contribute to educational strategies aimed at fostering digital competence and psychological resilience in AI-enhanced learning environments.
The Impact of AI Tool Usage on Student Well-Being in Higher Education: The Moderating Role of Self Efficacy / Celio, Francesca; Stagno, Emanuela; Ricotta, Francesco. - (2025). ( Tertiarization & sustainability. New challenges for management in the digital era Genova ).
The Impact of AI Tool Usage on Student Well-Being in Higher Education: The Moderating Role of Self Efficacy
Ricotta Francesco
2025
Abstract
The increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has raised critical questions about their impact on student well-being. This study examines the relationship between AI tool usage and well-being, with self-efficacy as a moderating variable. Grounded in positive psychology, the research differentiates between hedonic well-being, associated with immediate pleasure and life satisfaction, and eudaimonic well-being, which reflects personal growth and self-actualization. Results indicate that AI tool usage negatively affects hedonic well-being unless moderated by high self-efficacy, which enables students to derive greater satisfaction from AI-assisted learning. Conversely, AI tool usage alone does not significantly influence eudaimonic well-being, but when self-efficacy is high, students experience enhanced psychological flourishing. These findings highlight self-efficacy as a crucial determinant in maximizing AI’s benefits, shaping students’ ability to transform technology into a tool for both subjective happiness and long-term self- development. This study underscores the importance of analyzing the distinct effects of AI on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being, as their underlying mechanisms differ. The insights contribute to educational strategies aimed at fostering digital competence and psychological resilience in AI-enhanced learning environments.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


