Standard management for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-NMIBC) often involves a substantial treatment burden, which is not justified by the relatively indolent course of the disease, prompting a need for de-intensification strategies. Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative approach aimed at reducing overtreatment in selected patients. However, the broader adoption of AS is hindered by a lack of standardized protocols for patient selection, monitoring and intervention. To address this gap, we conducted an international, two-round Delphi consensus among 51 bladder cancer experts to establish foundational statements for the use of AS. Consensus was achieved on 20 statements, providing clear recommendations for terminology; inclusion and exclusion criteria; follow-up monitoring; and exit criteria. This Delphi consensus provides the first expert-driven framework to standardize the clinical application of AS for LG-NMIBC. These statements could guide current clinical practice and unify the design of future trials.
Active surveillance in low-grade NMIBC — results of an international two-round modified Delphi consensus / Contieri, R., Gontero, P., Hurle, R., Afferi, L., Albisinni, S., Babjuk, M., Birtle, A., Black, P., Brausi, M., Bruins, M., Čapoun, O., Carrion, A., Catto, J., Choudhury, A., Cimadamore, A., Comperat, E., Daneshmand, S., D'Andrea, D., Del Giudice, F., Escrig, J.L.D., et al.. - In: NATURE REVIEWS. UROLOGY. - ISSN 1759-4812. - (2026). [10.1038/s41585-026-01137-8]
Active surveillance in low-grade NMIBC — results of an international two-round modified Delphi consensus
Albisinni, Simone;D'andrea, David;Del Giudice, Francesco;Mari, Andrea;Panebianco, Valeria;
2026
Abstract
Standard management for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-NMIBC) often involves a substantial treatment burden, which is not justified by the relatively indolent course of the disease, prompting a need for de-intensification strategies. Active surveillance (AS) is an alternative approach aimed at reducing overtreatment in selected patients. However, the broader adoption of AS is hindered by a lack of standardized protocols for patient selection, monitoring and intervention. To address this gap, we conducted an international, two-round Delphi consensus among 51 bladder cancer experts to establish foundational statements for the use of AS. Consensus was achieved on 20 statements, providing clear recommendations for terminology; inclusion and exclusion criteria; follow-up monitoring; and exit criteria. This Delphi consensus provides the first expert-driven framework to standardize the clinical application of AS for LG-NMIBC. These statements could guide current clinical practice and unify the design of future trials.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s41585-026-01137-8.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: Contieri_Active_2026
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.11 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.11 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


