Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
Catalogo dei prodotti della ricerca
Purpose: In critically ill patients, extubation readiness is typically assessed using a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Among patients with acute brain injury (ABI), the optimal SBT method remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the ENIO study (NCT03400904), including mechanically ventilated ABI patients with available SBT data, undergoing extubation attempt. SBTs were classified as T-piece, pressure support ventilation (PSV), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The primary outcome was extubation failure within 5 days. Associations between SBT modality and extubation failure were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Of 1,512 patients enrolled in ENIO, 839 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 270 (32.2%) were female and 396 (47.2%) had traumatic brain injury as the cause of admission. SBTs were performed with PSV in 430 (51.3%), T-piece in 329 (39.2%), and CPAP in 80 (9.5%). SBT median duration was 60 min in PSV and T-piece, while 120 min in CPAP. Extubation failure occurred in 177 (21.1%) cases. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between SBT modality or duration and extubation outcome. Results were similar in ABI subgroup analyses. After inverse probability weighting, vigorous cough remained the only significant predictor of extubation success. Conclusions: In this large international ABI cohort, neither SBT mode nor duration was associated with extubation failure.
Purpose: In critically ill patients, extubation readiness is typically assessed using a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). Among patients with acute brain injury (ABI), the optimal SBT method remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the ENIO study (NCT03400904), including mechanically ventilated ABI patients with available SBT data, undergoing extubation attempt. SBTs were classified as T-piece, pressure support ventilation (PSV), or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The primary outcome was extubation failure within 5 days. Associations between SBT modality and extubation failure were assessed using multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Of 1,512 patients enrolled in ENIO, 839 met the inclusion criteria, of whom 270 (32.2%) were female and 396 (47.2%) had traumatic brain injury as the cause of admission. SBTs were performed with PSV in 430 (51.3%), T-piece in 329 (39.2%), and CPAP in 80 (9.5%). SBT median duration was 60 min in PSV and T-piece, while 120 min in CPAP. Extubation failure occurred in 177 (21.1%) cases. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between SBT modality or duration and extubation outcome. Results were similar in ABI subgroup analyses. After inverse probability weighting, vigorous cough remained the only significant predictor of extubation success. Conclusions: In this large international ABI cohort, neither SBT mode nor duration was associated with extubation failure.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1766951
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
ND
ND
2
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.