The book by Lilie Chouliaraki, Wronged. The Weaponization of Victimhood (New York City, Columbia University Press, 2024, 264 pp.), examines the semantic and political transformation of victimhood, from a condition rooted in structural vulnerability to a discursive resource strategically mobilized by privileged actors. Within contemporary media environments, suffering is embedded in a competitive economy of visibility, giving rise to a form of “emotional capitalism” in which diverse claims to pain are granted moral equivalence, thereby obscuring structural inequalities. Victimhood is thus redefined as a performative and strategic communicative practice that sustains existing power relations and contributes to the delegitimization of marginalized groups. By analyzing “reverse victimhood” and the performative construction of victim status, the volume traces a shift from a politics of justice to a politics of affect, critically engaging with the role of media and journalism in shaping representations of suffering and advancing heuristic tools for a more ethically grounded rearticulation of narratives of pain.
Il volume di Lilie Chouliaraki, Wronged. The Weaponization of Victimhood (New York City, Columbia University Press, 2024, pp. 264), analizza la trasformazione semantica e politica dello status di vittima, da condizione legata a vulnerabilità sistemiche a risorsa discorsiva mobilitata anche da soggetti privilegiati. All’interno delle ecologie mediali contemporanee, la sofferenza viene collocata in una logica competitiva di visibilità, configurando un “capitalismo emozionale” in cui rivendicazioni eterogenee di dolore acquisiscono un’equivalenza morale che oscura le disuguaglianze strutturali. Il concetto di vittimismo è così ridefinito come pratica comunicativa performativa e strategica, funzionale alla riproduzione dei rapporti di potere e alla delegittimazione delle minoranze. Attraverso l’analisi della “vittimizzazione inversa” e della performatività dello status-vittima, il volume evidenzia il passaggio da una politica della giustizia a una politica del sentimento, interrogando criticamente il ruolo dei media e del giornalismo nella rappresentazione del dolore e proponendo strumenti euristici per una riformulazione etica delle narrazioni della sofferenza.
Two wrongs don’t make a right. La vittimizzazione come strategia politica e mediale / Di Benedetto, Giacomo. - In: PROBLEMI DELL'INFORMAZIONE. - ISSN 0390-5195. - 1(2026), pp. 103-105. [10.1445/120403]
Two wrongs don’t make a right. La vittimizzazione come strategia politica e mediale
giacomo di benedetto
2026
Abstract
The book by Lilie Chouliaraki, Wronged. The Weaponization of Victimhood (New York City, Columbia University Press, 2024, 264 pp.), examines the semantic and political transformation of victimhood, from a condition rooted in structural vulnerability to a discursive resource strategically mobilized by privileged actors. Within contemporary media environments, suffering is embedded in a competitive economy of visibility, giving rise to a form of “emotional capitalism” in which diverse claims to pain are granted moral equivalence, thereby obscuring structural inequalities. Victimhood is thus redefined as a performative and strategic communicative practice that sustains existing power relations and contributes to the delegitimization of marginalized groups. By analyzing “reverse victimhood” and the performative construction of victim status, the volume traces a shift from a politics of justice to a politics of affect, critically engaging with the role of media and journalism in shaping representations of suffering and advancing heuristic tools for a more ethically grounded rearticulation of narratives of pain.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


