The essay analyzes the concept of «safe country of origin» and its evolution in national legislation in order to assess both its consistency with Article 10 of the Constitution and its paradoxical instrumentalization in relation to security concerns aimed at a «restrictive» policy of migration management. From this perspective, the Alace and Canpelli case is seen as a turning point and, at the same time, the culmination of the clash between political power and judicial power, the latter understood as a (constitutional) limit to power.
Il caso "Alace” e ”Canpelli” e il concetto di paese di origine sicuro come paradigma: (r)esiste un giudice a Berlino? / Piacentini Vernata, Andrea. - In: POLITICA DEL DIRITTO. - ISSN 0032-3063. - 3-4:(2025), pp. 429-446. [10.1437/120336)]
Il caso "Alace” e ”Canpelli” e il concetto di paese di origine sicuro come paradigma: (r)esiste un giudice a Berlino?
Andrea Piacentini VernataPrimo
2025
Abstract
The essay analyzes the concept of «safe country of origin» and its evolution in national legislation in order to assess both its consistency with Article 10 of the Constitution and its paradoxical instrumentalization in relation to security concerns aimed at a «restrictive» policy of migration management. From this perspective, the Alace and Canpelli case is seen as a turning point and, at the same time, the culmination of the clash between political power and judicial power, the latter understood as a (constitutional) limit to power.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Vernata_Paesi_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Note: "articolo principale"
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
111.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
111.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
