The significant impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on academia, industry, and government has led to a strong focus on the realization of trustworthy AI systems. Among them, there is an emerging class of process-aware information systems infused with AI, called AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems (ABPMSs), which autonomously unfold and adapt the execution flow of business processes (BPs) through continuous conversation with their human principals, who oversee the system decision. While much research on trustworthy AI has been conducted on devising general-purpose trust recommendations, in this paper we take a first step toward exploring the role of trust to develop trustworthy ABPMSs. Specifically, we assess a relevant subset of trustworthy AI principles against the lifecycle stages of an ABPMS, thus providing a classification framework that identifies to which principles the ABPMS stages should conform. Then, we test the applicability of our framework on a real-world healthcare BP, and we evaluate its reliability through a user study involving 15 academics at the intersection of AI and BPM. The results show a promising consensus that our framework reasonably aligns trustworthy AI principles with the ABPMS stages.
The Role of Trust in AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems / Acitelli, G., Agostinelli, S., Casciani, A., Marrella, A.. - 543:(2025), pp. 5-17. (22nd International Conference on Business Process Management, BPM 2024 Krakow, Poland ) [10.1007/978-3-031-78666-2_1].
The Role of Trust in AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems
Giacomo Acitelli;Simone Agostinelli;Angelo Casciani
;Andrea Marrella
2025
Abstract
The significant impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on academia, industry, and government has led to a strong focus on the realization of trustworthy AI systems. Among them, there is an emerging class of process-aware information systems infused with AI, called AI-Augmented Business Process Management Systems (ABPMSs), which autonomously unfold and adapt the execution flow of business processes (BPs) through continuous conversation with their human principals, who oversee the system decision. While much research on trustworthy AI has been conducted on devising general-purpose trust recommendations, in this paper we take a first step toward exploring the role of trust to develop trustworthy ABPMSs. Specifically, we assess a relevant subset of trustworthy AI principles against the lifecycle stages of an ABPMS, thus providing a classification framework that identifies to which principles the ABPMS stages should conform. Then, we test the applicability of our framework on a real-world healthcare BP, and we evaluate its reliability through a user study involving 15 academics at the intersection of AI and BPM. The results show a promising consensus that our framework reasonably aligns trustworthy AI principles with the ABPMS stages.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Acitelli_postprint_The-Role_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265407599165003
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
482.33 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
482.33 kB | Adobe PDF | |
|
Acitelli_The-Role_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
3.92 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
3.92 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


