Immunohistochemical characterization of glomerular and tubulointerstitial infiltrates in renal transplant patients with chronic allograft dysfunction

BACKGROUND:The term chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) was deleted in the Eighth Banff Classification and two new categories were introduced: chronic T-cell-mediated rejection (CTMR) and chronic active humoral rejection (CAHR). The aim of this study was to revise our CAN cases diagnosed in the last 4 years, analyse allograft survival rates and identify types of infiltrating cells in the different settings.METHODS:Seventy-nine patients with biopsy-proven CAN were examined and classified into four groups according to the Banff 2005 criteria: CTMR, CAHR, chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNITOX) and interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy not otherwise specified (NOS). CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, CD103, Foxp3 and IL-17 protein expression and C4d deposits were investigated.RESULTS:We diagnosed 20 CTMR, 13 CAHR, 28 CNITOX, and 18 NOS. Death-censored graft survival at 4 years from renal biopsy was worse in CAHR compared with the other types of chronic injury. Glomerular CD8(+) cells were increased in CTMR vs CNITOX and NOS. Interstitial CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells were increased in CTMR vs CNITOX. CD68(+) cells in glomerular and peritubular capillaries were higher in CAHR vs CNITOX, CTMR and NOS. CD103(+) cells were higher in cases with tubulitis than in those without. T regulatory and T helper 17 cells were rarely observed in the different settings.CONCLUSIONS:Graft survival was worse in patients with CAHR. The presence of any grade transplant glomerulopathy and chronic allograft vasculopathy are poorer prognostic factors. Infiltrating CD8(+), CD103(+) and CD4(+) cells may help to differentiate CTMR from other types of chronic injury, thus improving diagnostic/prognostic features of biopsy in patients with chronic allograft dysfunction.