Association of Mild-to-Moderate Aortic Regurgitation With Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Objective: To assess aortic regurgitation (AR) prevalence, its hemodynamic effect, and long-term prognostic implications in patients admitted with de novo or worsened heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: Consecutive patients hospitalized with de novo or worsened HFpEF between 2014 and 2020 were enrolled. Patients with more than moderate aortic and/or mitral valve disease were excluded. Based on the presence and degree of AR, patients were divided into those without AR, those with mild, and those with moderate AR. Data on cardiovascular death, heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, and their composite (major adverse cardiovascular events) were collected. Results: The final study population consisted of 458 HFpEF patients: 156 (34.1%) with mild-AR, 153 (33.4%) with moderate-AR, and the remaining 149 (32.5%) with no AR. Mild-to-moderate AR patients were older, with larger left atrium–left ventricle (LV) volumes, greater LV mass index, higher filling pressure, and prevalence of diastolic dysfunction compared with the no-AR group (all P<.05). During 5-year follow-up, 113 patients died of cardiovascular causes, 124 patients were rehospitalized for HF, whereas 196 experienced the composite endpoint. Mild-to-moderate AR was identified as an independent predictor of all-cause death (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.58; P=.04) and major adverse cardiovascular event occurrence (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.09; P=.02). A total of 126 (35.5%) of 355 patients showed progression of AR at follow-up echocardiography. Conclusion: Mild-to-moderate AR is common among patients hospitalized for HFpEF. It is associated with adverse LV remodeling and worse long-term outcomes. These findings warrant further prospective studies addressing the importance of AR in prognostic stratification and exploring therapeutic strategies to mitigate its hemodynamic effect on HF.