This paper critically responds to the Nature(2025) article on Punic genetic ancestry, based on ancient DNA from 14 Mediterranean sites,like Motya and Carthage. While the genetic analysis is technically robust, its historical conclusions are undermined by major methodological flaws. The dataset focuses on individuals post-600 BC, excluding earlier Phoenician phases due to cremation, which prevents DNA recovery. As a result, Levantine ancestry is likely underrepresented. The small sample size-about 200 individuals-is negligible compared to the vast Punic population. Furthermore, the idea of a uniform “Phoenician DNA” to compare with is weak, as Levantine populations were genetically mixed during both the Bronze and Iron Ages. The article’s claim of minimal Levantine ancestry is therefore misleading.Nevertheless, results of such analyses may help in understanding the following developments of Phoenician colonies as inclusive communities, open to autochthonous contributions.

A RESPONSE TO THE ARTICLE:“PUNIC PEOPLE WERE GENETICALLY DIVERSE WITH ALMOST NO LEVANTINE ANCESTORS” / Nigro, Lorenzo. - In: VICINO ORIENTE. - ISSN 2724-587X. - XXX:(2025), pp. 49-53. [10.53131/VO2724-587X2025_3]

A RESPONSE TO THE ARTICLE:“PUNIC PEOPLE WERE GENETICALLY DIVERSE WITH ALMOST NO LEVANTINE ANCESTORS”

Nigro, Lorenzo
2025

Abstract

This paper critically responds to the Nature(2025) article on Punic genetic ancestry, based on ancient DNA from 14 Mediterranean sites,like Motya and Carthage. While the genetic analysis is technically robust, its historical conclusions are undermined by major methodological flaws. The dataset focuses on individuals post-600 BC, excluding earlier Phoenician phases due to cremation, which prevents DNA recovery. As a result, Levantine ancestry is likely underrepresented. The small sample size-about 200 individuals-is negligible compared to the vast Punic population. Furthermore, the idea of a uniform “Phoenician DNA” to compare with is weak, as Levantine populations were genetically mixed during both the Bronze and Iron Ages. The article’s claim of minimal Levantine ancestry is therefore misleading.Nevertheless, results of such analyses may help in understanding the following developments of Phoenician colonies as inclusive communities, open to autochthonous contributions.
2025
aDNA; Punic; Carthage; Motya; cultural identity vs. population
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A RESPONSE TO THE ARTICLE:“PUNIC PEOPLE WERE GENETICALLY DIVERSE WITH ALMOST NO LEVANTINE ANCESTORS” / Nigro, Lorenzo. - In: VICINO ORIENTE. - ISSN 2724-587X. - XXX:(2025), pp. 49-53. [10.53131/VO2724-587X2025_3]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1763579
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact