Attenzione: i dati modificati non sono ancora stati salvati. Per confermare inserimenti o cancellazioni di voci è necessario confermare con il tasto SALVA/INSERISCI in fondo alla pagina
Catalogo dei prodotti della ricerca
Aims: The BRING-UP 3 Heart Failure (HF) study was designed to the real-world implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), given the limited evidence on the uptake of the contemporary four-pillar treatment strategy. Methods: BRING-UP 3 HF study is an observational, prospective, nationwide investigation encompassing 179 sites. This analysis includes HFrEF patients enrolled in the ambulatory and hospitalized cohorts with complete pharmacological data at 6-month follow-up. The objective was to describe the use of the four GDMT pillars after 6 months. Results: Among 3,201 HFrEF patients enrolled, 142 (4.4%) had died by 6 months, and treatment data were available for 2950 patients. Mean age was 69±11 years (26.6% >75 years), 18.0% were female. Prescription rates of GDMT were high at baseline and remained stable over 6-months, with a shift from ACE-I/ARBs to ARNIs, and a modest increase in SGLT2i use. A significant reduction in diuretic prescription was also observed. Quadruple therapy was prescribed in 64.3% of patients at 6 months versus 63.9% at baseline/discharge (p=NS), while quadruple therapy including ARNI went from 52.9% to 55.9%, p <0.0001. Dose up-titration of GDMT remained suboptimal, with most agents prescribed at <50% of target doses. Discontinuation rates at follow-up were very low. Conclusions: In this large nationwide cohort, guideline-directed therapies for HFrEF were widely implemented and maintained over 6 months with excellent treatment persistence. However, dose optimization remains a key unmet need in routine clinical practice.
Medical treatments at 6 months in hospitalized and ambulatory HFrEF patients in the BRING-UP 3 Heart Failure study / Oliva, F., Orso, F., Colivicchi, F., Cipriani, M.G., Di Lenarda, A., Gori, M., Gorini, M., Iacoviello, M., Lucci, D., Marini, M., Bonvicini, E., Carugo, S., Catalano, M., D'Elia, E., Gentile, P., Matassini, M.V., Navazio, A., Russo, D., Tini, G., Tinti, M.D., et al.. - In: ESC HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 2055-5822. - (2026). [10.1093/eschf/xvag043]
Medical treatments at 6 months in hospitalized and ambulatory HFrEF patients in the BRING-UP 3 Heart Failure study
Aims: The BRING-UP 3 Heart Failure (HF) study was designed to the real-world implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), given the limited evidence on the uptake of the contemporary four-pillar treatment strategy. Methods: BRING-UP 3 HF study is an observational, prospective, nationwide investigation encompassing 179 sites. This analysis includes HFrEF patients enrolled in the ambulatory and hospitalized cohorts with complete pharmacological data at 6-month follow-up. The objective was to describe the use of the four GDMT pillars after 6 months. Results: Among 3,201 HFrEF patients enrolled, 142 (4.4%) had died by 6 months, and treatment data were available for 2950 patients. Mean age was 69±11 years (26.6% >75 years), 18.0% were female. Prescription rates of GDMT were high at baseline and remained stable over 6-months, with a shift from ACE-I/ARBs to ARNIs, and a modest increase in SGLT2i use. A significant reduction in diuretic prescription was also observed. Quadruple therapy was prescribed in 64.3% of patients at 6 months versus 63.9% at baseline/discharge (p=NS), while quadruple therapy including ARNI went from 52.9% to 55.9%, p <0.0001. Dose up-titration of GDMT remained suboptimal, with most agents prescribed at <50% of target doses. Discontinuation rates at follow-up were very low. Conclusions: In this large nationwide cohort, guideline-directed therapies for HFrEF were widely implemented and maintained over 6 months with excellent treatment persistence. However, dose optimization remains a key unmet need in routine clinical practice.
adherence; chronic heart failure; guidelines; medical treatments; registry
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Medical treatments at 6 months in hospitalized and ambulatory HFrEF patients in the BRING-UP 3 Heart Failure study / Oliva, F., Orso, F., Colivicchi, F., Cipriani, M.G., Di Lenarda, A., Gori, M., Gorini, M., Iacoviello, M., Lucci, D., Marini, M., Bonvicini, E., Carugo, S., Catalano, M., D'Elia, E., Gentile, P., Matassini, M.V., Navazio, A., Russo, D., Tini, G., Tinti, M.D., et al.. - In: ESC HEART FAILURE. - ISSN 2055-5822. - (2026). [10.1093/eschf/xvag043]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1761055
Attenzione
Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo
Citazioni
1
ND
ND
social impact
Conferma cancellazione
Sei sicuro che questo prodotto debba essere cancellato?
simulazione ASN
Il report seguente simula gli indicatori relativi alla propria produzione scientifica in relazione alle soglie ASN 2023-2025 del proprio SC/SSD. Si ricorda che il superamento dei valori soglia (almeno 2 su 3) è requisito necessario ma non sufficiente al conseguimento dell'abilitazione. La simulazione si basa sui dati IRIS e sugli indicatori bibliometrici alla data indicata e non tiene conto di eventuali periodi di congedo obbligatorio, che in sede di domanda ASN danno diritto a incrementi percentuali dei valori. La simulazione può differire dall'esito di un’eventuale domanda ASN sia per errori di catalogazione e/o dati mancanti in IRIS, sia per la variabilità dei dati bibliometrici nel tempo. Si consideri che Anvur calcola i valori degli indicatori all'ultima data utile per la presentazione delle domande.
La presente simulazione è stata realizzata sulla base delle specifiche raccolte sul tavolo ER del Focus Group IRIS coordinato dall’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e delle regole riportate nel DM 589/2018 e allegata Tabella A. Cineca, l’Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia e il Focus Group IRIS non si assumono alcuna responsabilità in merito all’uso che il diretto interessato o terzi faranno della simulazione. Si specifica inoltre che la simulazione contiene calcoli effettuati con dati e algoritmi di pubblico dominio e deve quindi essere considerata come un mero ausilio al calcolo svolgibile manualmente o con strumenti equivalenti.