To compare transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with coblation resection for base of tongue surgery in a multilevel setting of OSA surgical treatment. Thirty patients who underwent base of tongue resection with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and thirty patients who underwent coblation resection of the base of the tongue were enrolled in the study. Both groups were compared based on intraoperative findings, respiratory outcomes (apnea/hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and lowest SpO₂), functional outcomes, and complications. According to the surgeons' experience, tongue base exposure and visualization were better with TORS. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.4) in the success rate between TORS (70%) and coblation resection (63%). TORS and coblation are both effective techniques for base of tongue treatment in OSA patients. The surgical success rate, number of postoperative complications, and anatomical results were similar between the two techniques.

Base of tongue surgery for obstructive sleep apnea treatment in a multilevel setting: trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) vs endoscopic coblation surgery / Iannella, Giannicola; Bellizzi, Mario Giuseppe; Eplite, Angelo; Meccariello, Giuseppe; Cammaroto, Giovanni; Magliulo, Giuseppe; Greco, Antonio; De Virgilio, Armando; Pace, Annalisa; Maniaci, Antonino; Lechien, Jerome R.; Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.; Pang, Kenny; Croce, Enrica; Baghat, Ahmed Yassin; Vicini, Claudio. - In: INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. - ISSN 2231-3796. - (2025), pp. 1-10. [10.1007/s12070-025-06278-7]

Base of tongue surgery for obstructive sleep apnea treatment in a multilevel setting: trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) vs endoscopic coblation surgery

Iannella, Giannicola
Primo
;
Bellizzi, Mario Giuseppe
Secondo
;
Magliulo, Giuseppe;Greco, Antonio;De Virgilio, Armando;Pace, Annalisa;Croce, Enrica;
2025

Abstract

To compare transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with coblation resection for base of tongue surgery in a multilevel setting of OSA surgical treatment. Thirty patients who underwent base of tongue resection with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and thirty patients who underwent coblation resection of the base of the tongue were enrolled in the study. Both groups were compared based on intraoperative findings, respiratory outcomes (apnea/hypopnea index, oxygen desaturation index, and lowest SpO₂), functional outcomes, and complications. According to the surgeons' experience, tongue base exposure and visualization were better with TORS. There was no statistically significant difference (p=0.4) in the success rate between TORS (70%) and coblation resection (63%). TORS and coblation are both effective techniques for base of tongue treatment in OSA patients. The surgical success rate, number of postoperative complications, and anatomical results were similar between the two techniques.
2025
obstructive sleep apnea; transoral robotic surgery; coblation surgery; base of tongue
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Base of tongue surgery for obstructive sleep apnea treatment in a multilevel setting: trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) vs endoscopic coblation surgery / Iannella, Giannicola; Bellizzi, Mario Giuseppe; Eplite, Angelo; Meccariello, Giuseppe; Cammaroto, Giovanni; Magliulo, Giuseppe; Greco, Antonio; De Virgilio, Armando; Pace, Annalisa; Maniaci, Antonino; Lechien, Jerome R.; Chiesa-Estomba, Carlos M.; Pang, Kenny; Croce, Enrica; Baghat, Ahmed Yassin; Vicini, Claudio. - In: INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD AND NECK SURGERY. - ISSN 2231-3796. - (2025), pp. 1-10. [10.1007/s12070-025-06278-7]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Iannella_Base of tongue_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.92 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.92 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1761044
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact