Nowadays, the integration of advanced digital technologies into heritage practices has transformed both methodologies and approaches for built heritage management. Among these innovations, Digital Twin technology represents a promising tool for enabling dynamic, data-driven workflows that support recovery and valorization activities. However, their implementation within the industrial heritage context is currently limited, and challenges arise in determining the suitability of the available solutions for specific project requirements. This study offers a comparative evaluation of ten software and services, Dalux, Trimble Connect, Autodesk Viewer, Speckle, Cesium JS, Autodesk Tandem, Azure Digital Twins, Matterport, Fuzor, and Twinmotion, applied to the former Roman University Representative Board (ORUR) and the University Sports Complex (CUS) in Rome. Each solution is assessed based on criteria such as accessibility, interoperability, functionality performance, IoT integration, and collaborative features. The results aim to provide an evaluation of the different features, supporting users in selecting the most appropriate option according to the objectives of the application and specific requirements of the heritage context.

Evaluating Digital Twin Software and Services for Industrial Construction. A Comparative Assessment of ORUR-CUS Sheds and Building / Alagia, Andrea; Cui, Cassia De Lian; Curra', Edoardo; Yuan, Yangyang. - (2026), pp. 827-834. ( 3° Stati Generali del Patrimonio Industriale di AIPAI Bari, Matera, Lecce; Italia ).

Evaluating Digital Twin Software and Services for Industrial Construction. A Comparative Assessment of ORUR-CUS Sheds and Building

Andrea Alagia;Cassia De Lian Cui;Edoardo Curra';
2026

Abstract

Nowadays, the integration of advanced digital technologies into heritage practices has transformed both methodologies and approaches for built heritage management. Among these innovations, Digital Twin technology represents a promising tool for enabling dynamic, data-driven workflows that support recovery and valorization activities. However, their implementation within the industrial heritage context is currently limited, and challenges arise in determining the suitability of the available solutions for specific project requirements. This study offers a comparative evaluation of ten software and services, Dalux, Trimble Connect, Autodesk Viewer, Speckle, Cesium JS, Autodesk Tandem, Azure Digital Twins, Matterport, Fuzor, and Twinmotion, applied to the former Roman University Representative Board (ORUR) and the University Sports Complex (CUS) in Rome. Each solution is assessed based on criteria such as accessibility, interoperability, functionality performance, IoT integration, and collaborative features. The results aim to provide an evaluation of the different features, supporting users in selecting the most appropriate option according to the objectives of the application and specific requirements of the heritage context.
2026
3° Stati Generali del Patrimonio Industriale di AIPAI
digital twin; industrial construction; tools evaluation; comparative analysis
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Evaluating Digital Twin Software and Services for Industrial Construction. A Comparative Assessment of ORUR-CUS Sheds and Building / Alagia, Andrea; Cui, Cassia De Lian; Curra', Edoardo; Yuan, Yangyang. - (2026), pp. 827-834. ( 3° Stati Generali del Patrimonio Industriale di AIPAI Bari, Matera, Lecce; Italia ).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Alagia_Evaluating-digital-twin_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Copertina, frontespizio, indice, contributo, bibliografia
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.73 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1760449
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact