Background and objective Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has limited accuracy, and it is linked to overdiagnosis. The PROSA trial aimed to evaluate whether a contrast-free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-first screening strategy improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall PCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective. Methods This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49–69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective. Key findings and limitations Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1–6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.
Primary Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial (PROSA) / Messina, Emanuele; Borrelli, Antonella; Sciarra, Alessandro; Laschena, Ludovica; Antonini, Debora; Shaholli, David; Magliocca, Fabio M.; Novelli, Simone; Santini, Daniele; La Torre, Giuseppe; Panebianco, Valeria. - In: EUROPEAN UROLOGY. - ISSN 0302-2838. - (2025). [10.1016/j.eururo.2025.11.024]
Primary Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial (PROSA)
Messina, Emanuele;Borrelli, Antonella;Sciarra, Alessandro;Laschena, Ludovica;Shaholli, David;Magliocca, Fabio M.;Santini, Daniele;La Torre, Giuseppe;Panebianco, Valeria
2025
Abstract
Background and objective Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) has limited accuracy, and it is linked to overdiagnosis. The PROSA trial aimed to evaluate whether a contrast-free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-first screening strategy improves the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) as the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included overall PCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective. Methods This single-center, randomized controlled trial enrolled 816 asymptomatic men aged 49–69 yr (≥40 yr with a PCa family history). Participants were randomized into two arms: arm A underwent bpMRI regardless of the PSA levels; arm B received bpMRI only if PSA ≥3 ng/ml (or 2.5 ng/ml with a family history). Men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score ≥3 were directed to a targeted biopsy. Imaging and pathology assessors were blinded; csPCa is defined as International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2. The primary outcomes included csPCa detection, benefit-harm metrics, and cost effectiveness from a health care payer perspective. Key findings and limitations Among 759 randomized men, biopsy and csPCa detection rates were higher in arm A (10.8% and 4.6%, respectively) than in arm B (5.2% and 1.8%, respectively), with a relative risk of 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.1–6.1; p = 0.05) for the csPCa detection rate. Benefit-harm metrics favored the MRI-first strategy, showing higher grade selectivity (1.89 vs 1.75), biopsy efficiency (0.74 vs 0.54), and biopsy avoidance (23.1 vs 11.9). No serious adverse event was recorded. The MRI-first strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €2201.75 per csPCa case detected. Limitations include single-round design and short follow-up. Conclusions and clinical implications In this randomized screening trial, a contrast-free MRI-first pathway improved csPCa detection, enhanced benefit-harm metrics, and showed favorable cost effectiveness.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S030228382504847X-main.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Note: Messina_Primary Noncontrast_2025
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.41 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.41 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


