Political parties offer gateways to power for democratic leaders, but they also condition leaders’ activities. A “presidentialized” party organization enhances the operative capacity of leaders, including presidents that have been overlooked in European political science literature. Theoretically, two factors are expected to increase the “presidentiality” of parties: a president-centered regime type and party’s leader-centric “genetic” heritage. This study presents the first systematic effort to analyze causes of party presidentialization quantitatively in various national contexts and party types. Alongside full presidential systems, the study pays attention to semi-presidential systems that are most popular in European countries today and which present mixed incentives for parties by forcing them to facilitate several leader positions at the executive level simultaneously. To assess these relationships empirically, the study utilizes Political Party Database Project’s (PPDB) global dataset. We develop a conceptually robust and comparable measure for party presidentialization and apply it to 96 parties in 25 semi-presidential and presidential democracies. We explore the impacts of regime and party types and find considerable support for the former and more limited support for the latter. Our results suggest that parties’ organizational makeup can condition presidential activism.

Party organization and presidential activism. System -and party- level determinants of party “presidentialization” / Koskimaa, Vesa; Passarelli, Gianluca. - In: POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW. - ISSN 1478-9299. - 23:1(2024), pp. 70-96. [10.1177/14789299241289760]

Party organization and presidential activism. System -and party- level determinants of party “presidentialization”

Passarelli, Gianluca
Co-primo
Writing – Review & Editing
2024

Abstract

Political parties offer gateways to power for democratic leaders, but they also condition leaders’ activities. A “presidentialized” party organization enhances the operative capacity of leaders, including presidents that have been overlooked in European political science literature. Theoretically, two factors are expected to increase the “presidentiality” of parties: a president-centered regime type and party’s leader-centric “genetic” heritage. This study presents the first systematic effort to analyze causes of party presidentialization quantitatively in various national contexts and party types. Alongside full presidential systems, the study pays attention to semi-presidential systems that are most popular in European countries today and which present mixed incentives for parties by forcing them to facilitate several leader positions at the executive level simultaneously. To assess these relationships empirically, the study utilizes Political Party Database Project’s (PPDB) global dataset. We develop a conceptually robust and comparable measure for party presidentialization and apply it to 96 parties in 25 semi-presidential and presidential democracies. We explore the impacts of regime and party types and find considerable support for the former and more limited support for the latter. Our results suggest that parties’ organizational makeup can condition presidential activism.
2024
political parties; presidentialization; presidents
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Party organization and presidential activism. System -and party- level determinants of party “presidentialization” / Koskimaa, Vesa; Passarelli, Gianluca. - In: POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW. - ISSN 1478-9299. - 23:1(2024), pp. 70-96. [10.1177/14789299241289760]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Passarelli_Party-organization_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 344 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
344 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1758469
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact