This essay explores the influence of Shakespeare on Melville’s conception of evil, from the oscillation between innocence and corruption in Typee, through the tragic grandeur of Moby-Dick, to the satirical skepticism of The Confidence-Man. Melville’s lifelong engagement with Shakespeare, evident in his marginalia and in the ongoing dialogue with the playwright, sets his work in a tradition that both ridicules and admires villainy while exposing its paradoxical ties to truth. The Confidence-Man, the most overtly Shakespearean of Melville’s novels, stages a “masquerade of evil” through its shapeshifting, devil-like protagonist, who recalls Shylock and Autolycus yet unsettles the role of villain by pretending to reject Timon’s misanthropy. Timon of Athens thus emerges as a key intertext, alongside The Winter’s Tale, whose shifts from tragedy to comedy offer a striking contrast: where Shakespeare turns tragedy into redemption, Melville drives his masquerade toward indeterminacy and overarching obscurity.
Melville's Shakespearean Masquerade of Evil: "The Confidence-Man" / Simonetti, Paolo. - In: MEMORIA DI SHAKESPEARE. - ISSN 2283-8759. - 12:(2025), pp. 289-318.
Melville's Shakespearean Masquerade of Evil: "The Confidence-Man"
Paolo Simonetti
2025
Abstract
This essay explores the influence of Shakespeare on Melville’s conception of evil, from the oscillation between innocence and corruption in Typee, through the tragic grandeur of Moby-Dick, to the satirical skepticism of The Confidence-Man. Melville’s lifelong engagement with Shakespeare, evident in his marginalia and in the ongoing dialogue with the playwright, sets his work in a tradition that both ridicules and admires villainy while exposing its paradoxical ties to truth. The Confidence-Man, the most overtly Shakespearean of Melville’s novels, stages a “masquerade of evil” through its shapeshifting, devil-like protagonist, who recalls Shylock and Autolycus yet unsettles the role of villain by pretending to reject Timon’s misanthropy. Timon of Athens thus emerges as a key intertext, alongside The Winter’s Tale, whose shifts from tragedy to comedy offer a striking contrast: where Shakespeare turns tragedy into redemption, Melville drives his masquerade toward indeterminacy and overarching obscurity.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


