The relationship between Ernesto de Martino and Raffaele Pettazzoni, probably the two greatest historians of religion in 20th-century Italy, was a complex one. Pettazzoni, a generation older, supported de Martino in his intellectual and academic career, and de Martino felt in some ways that he was his “disciple”; however, the latter's philosophical and historicist training always prevented him from identifying with his mentor's predominantly philological approach. In this article, we will examine their relationship from four perspectives: a) the role Pettazzoni played in de Martino’s intellectual training and in his choice of ethnology of religions as his field of study; b) the importance of the dialogue between the two scholars in the gestation of Il Mondo magico, and on the other hand, Pettazzoni’s criticism of the book; c) the collaboration between the two in the battle for secularism not only in the history of religions, but in Italian society as a whole; d) de Martino's explicit criticism of Pettazzoni in the more mature phase of his thinking
(con F. Dei) Fra filologia e storiografia: la difficile alleanza fra De Martino e Pettazzoni / Fanelli, Antonio. - In: STORIA, ANTROPOLOGIA E SCIENZE DEL LINGUAGGIO. - ISSN 0394-7963. - 1-2-3:(2025), pp. 303-338.
(con F. Dei) Fra filologia e storiografia: la difficile alleanza fra De Martino e Pettazzoni
Antonio Fanelli
2025
Abstract
The relationship between Ernesto de Martino and Raffaele Pettazzoni, probably the two greatest historians of religion in 20th-century Italy, was a complex one. Pettazzoni, a generation older, supported de Martino in his intellectual and academic career, and de Martino felt in some ways that he was his “disciple”; however, the latter's philosophical and historicist training always prevented him from identifying with his mentor's predominantly philological approach. In this article, we will examine their relationship from four perspectives: a) the role Pettazzoni played in de Martino’s intellectual training and in his choice of ethnology of religions as his field of study; b) the importance of the dialogue between the two scholars in the gestation of Il Mondo magico, and on the other hand, Pettazzoni’s criticism of the book; c) the collaboration between the two in the battle for secularism not only in the history of religions, but in Italian society as a whole; d) de Martino's explicit criticism of Pettazzoni in the more mature phase of his thinkingI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


