This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Self-Efficacy for Performing Energy Conservation Strategies Assessment (SEPECSA) and assess the psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) in an Italian-speaking population with multiple sclerosis (MS). A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants with MS. The SEPECSA and IPA were validated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Checklist (COSMIN). Reliability was evaluated through Cronbach’s alpha (α) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while validity was assessed correlating the instruments with the Fatigue Severity Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire–Revised, and MS Quality of Life–54. In 84 people, both scales demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α >0.9) and test–retest reliability (0.946 < ICC < 0.980). SEPECSA showed a significant correlation with fatigue (r = 0.349, p < .001), while IPA was associated with improved social integration (−0.354 −0.547, p < .001) and quality of life (−.254 −0.626; p < .001). Translated and culturally adapted SEPECSA and IPA are valid and reliable tools.

Validation of IPA and SEPECSA in Italian Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Psychometric Study / Pietrodarchi, Alice; Berardi, Anna; Galeoto, Giovanni; Panuccio, Francescaroberta; Simeon, Rachele. - In: OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH. - ISSN 1539-4492. - Online ahead of print:(2025), pp. 1-10. [10.1177/15394492251331445]

Validation of IPA and SEPECSA in Italian Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Psychometric Study

Pietrodarchi, Alice;Berardi, Anna;Galeoto, Giovanni;Panuccio, Francescaroberta;Simeon, Rachele
2025

Abstract

This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Self-Efficacy for Performing Energy Conservation Strategies Assessment (SEPECSA) and assess the psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) in an Italian-speaking population with multiple sclerosis (MS). A cross-sectional study was conducted with participants with MS. The SEPECSA and IPA were validated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments Checklist (COSMIN). Reliability was evaluated through Cronbach’s alpha (α) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), while validity was assessed correlating the instruments with the Fatigue Severity Scale, Community Integration Questionnaire–Revised, and MS Quality of Life–54. In 84 people, both scales demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α >0.9) and test–retest reliability (0.946 < ICC < 0.980). SEPECSA showed a significant correlation with fatigue (r = 0.349, p < .001), while IPA was associated with improved social integration (−0.354 −0.547, p < .001) and quality of life (−.254 −0.626; p < .001). Translated and culturally adapted SEPECSA and IPA are valid and reliable tools.
2025
social participation; self-awareness; participation; assessment
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Validation of IPA and SEPECSA in Italian Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis: A Psychometric Study / Pietrodarchi, Alice; Berardi, Anna; Galeoto, Giovanni; Panuccio, Francescaroberta; Simeon, Rachele. - In: OTJR-OCCUPATION PARTICIPATION AND HEALTH. - ISSN 1539-4492. - Online ahead of print:(2025), pp. 1-10. [10.1177/15394492251331445]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
pietrodarchi-et-al-2025-validation-of-ipa-and-sepecsa-in-italian-individuals-with-multiple-sclerosis-a-psychometric.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Pietrodarchi_Validation_2025
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 423.89 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
423.89 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1754569
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact