Introduction: Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting. Methods: We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative). Results: Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod (– 16.7 vs – 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was – 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and – 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator’s opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients / Pane, Chiara; Di Stefano, Vincenzo; Cuomo, Nunzia; Sarnataro, Alessio; Vinciguerra, Claudia; Bevilacqua, Liliana; Brighina, Filippo; Rini, Nicasio; Puorro, Giorgia; Marsili, Angela; Garibaldi, Matteo; Fionda, Laura; Saccà, Francesco. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5354. - 271:9(2024), pp. 6209-6219. [10.1007/s00415-024-12588-7]

A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients

Garibaldi, Matteo;Fionda, Laura;
2024

Abstract

Introduction: Eculizumab, a complement active antibody, and efgartigimod, an Fc fragment that blocks neonatal Fc receptor, are both approved to treat generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) patients. The objective of this study is to describe the clinical response to both treatments in a real-life setting. Methods: We collected baseline and follow-up clinical data using the Myasthenia Gravis-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL), and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG). We included 63 patients, 32 treated with eculizumab and 31 with efgartigimod. Of the efgartigimod-treated patients, 22 were anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody-positive (AChR-Ab +) and 9 were AChR-Ab- (3 MuSK-Ab + and 6 seronegative). Results: Both treatments showed similar efficacy relative to the MG-ADL scale reduction (p = 0.237). Efgartigimod had a similar effect on both AChR-Ab + and AChR-Ab- (p = 0.280). Eculizumab was superior to efgartigimod relative to the QMG score reduction for the entire dataset (p = 0.003) and was more likely to achieve a clinical response at the QMG compared to efgartigimod (OR 1.373; p = 0.016). Steroid-sparing effect was higher for eculizumab than efgartigimod (– 16.7 vs – 5.2 mg of the baseline daily dose at follow-up; p = 0.001). Mean speed of prednisone reduction was – 13.1 mg of the daily dose for each month of follow-up for eculizumab-treated patients and – 3.2 for efgartigimod (p = 0.001). We found three serious events, all not related to treatment in the investigator’s opinion. One eculizumab-treated patient experienced a severe pneumonia and died despite treatment. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence that eculizumab and efgartigimod can be used in clinical practice to reduce disability in gMG patients. Eculizumab-treated patients had a higher QMG response and steroid sparing effect. Efgartigimod may offer a more flexible schedule due to its cyclical use, no need for vaccination, and efficacy in AChR-Ab- patients.
2024
Innovative; MG-ADL; Observational; QMG; Real-world evidence; Seronegative
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A real-life experience with eculizumab and efgartigimod in generalized myasthenia gravis patients / Pane, Chiara; Di Stefano, Vincenzo; Cuomo, Nunzia; Sarnataro, Alessio; Vinciguerra, Claudia; Bevilacqua, Liliana; Brighina, Filippo; Rini, Nicasio; Puorro, Giorgia; Marsili, Angela; Garibaldi, Matteo; Fionda, Laura; Saccà, Francesco. - In: JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0340-5354. - 271:9(2024), pp. 6209-6219. [10.1007/s00415-024-12588-7]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1754541
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 35
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact