Background: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. Methods: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Findings: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. Conclusion: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision.

Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning / Davies, Rhodri H; Augusto, João B; Bhuva, Anish; Xue, Hui; Treibel, Thomas A; Yang, Ye; Hughes, Rebecca K; Bai, Wenjia; Lau, Clement; Shiwani, Hunain; Fontana, Marianna; Kozor, Rebecca; Herrey, Anna; Lopes, Luis R; Maestrini, Viviana; Rosmini, Stefania; Petersen, Steffen E; Kellman, Peter; Rueckert, Daniel; Greenwood, John P; Captur, Gabriella; Manisty, Charlotte; Schelbert, Erik; Moon, James C. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE. - ISSN 1097-6647. - 24:1(2022). [10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4]

Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning

Ye, Yang;Maestrini, Viviana;
2022

Abstract

Background: Measurement of cardiac structure and function from images (e.g. volumes, mass and derived parameters such as left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [LVEF]) guides care for millions. This is best assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), but image analysis is currently performed by individual clinicians, which introduces error. We sought to develop a machine learning algorithm for volumetric analysis of CMR images with demonstrably better precision than human analysis. Methods: A fully automated machine learning algorithm was trained on 1923 scans (10 scanner models, 13 institutions, 9 clinical conditions, 60,000 contours) and used to segment the LV blood volume and myocardium. Performance was quantified by measuring precision on an independent multi-site validation dataset with multiple pathologies with n = 109 patients, scanned twice. This dataset was augmented with a further 1277 patients scanned as part of routine clinical care to allow qualitative assessment of generalization ability by identifying mis-segmentations. Machine learning algorithm (‘machine’) performance was compared to three clinicians (‘human’) and a commercial tool (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging). Findings: Machine analysis was quicker (20 s per patient) than human (13 min). Overall machine mis-segmentation rate was 1 in 479 images for the combined dataset, occurring mostly in rare pathologies not encountered in training. Without correcting these mis-segmentations, machine analysis had superior precision to three clinicians (e.g. scan-rescan coefficients of variation of human vs machine: LVEF 6.0% vs 4.2%, LV mass 4.8% vs. 3.6%; both P < 0.05), translating to a 46% reduction in required trial sample size using an LVEF endpoint. Conclusion: We present a fully automated algorithm for measuring LV structure and global systolic function that betters human performance for speed and precision.
2022
cardiac magnetic resonance; cardiovascular imaging; image processing; machine learning; ventricular function
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Precision measurement of cardiac structure and function in cardiovascular magnetic resonance using machine learning / Davies, Rhodri H; Augusto, João B; Bhuva, Anish; Xue, Hui; Treibel, Thomas A; Yang, Ye; Hughes, Rebecca K; Bai, Wenjia; Lau, Clement; Shiwani, Hunain; Fontana, Marianna; Kozor, Rebecca; Herrey, Anna; Lopes, Luis R; Maestrini, Viviana; Rosmini, Stefania; Petersen, Steffen E; Kellman, Peter; Rueckert, Daniel; Greenwood, John P; Captur, Gabriella; Manisty, Charlotte; Schelbert, Erik; Moon, James C. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE. - ISSN 1097-6647. - 24:1(2022). [10.1186/s12968-022-00846-4]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Davies_Precision_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.47 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1754356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 60
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 55
social impact