Abstract The strengthening technique by external cable prestressing, until now limited to columns with circular hollow sections (CHSs), is here extended to H-shaped steel columns. To provide an innovative general treatment, an initial imperfection, obtained from the analytical equivalence between Eurocode 3 and Ayrton–Perry formulations, is introduced. By this, a geometrically and materially nonlinear imperfection analysis (GMNIA) is performed by the finite element commercial code Abaqus. A parametric analysis identifies the deviator length, cable tension, and slenderness ratio as key parameters. Results confirm that, on the one hand, cable prestressing yields a critical load that is approximately twice that for non-prestressed elements (680 kN against 340 kN for a beam 8 m long); this effect grows with the column length. On the other hand, a simulation on a two-story frame supported by 12 columns, each 4 m long, spaced by 4 and 6 m in the two directions, under vertical ‘dead’ load shows that prestressed HEA200 columns perform as non-prestressed larger HEA220 profiles; thus, their use in this case leads to saving approximately 1.18 tons of steel; both these results are of practical interest in design of steel structures.
GMNIA-Based Evaluation of Cable-Prestressed H-Shaped Steel Columns / Ziane, Noureddine; Ruta, Giuseppe. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 15:19(2025). [10.3390/app151910826]
GMNIA-Based Evaluation of Cable-Prestressed H-Shaped Steel Columns
Ruta, Giuseppe
Secondo
2025
Abstract
Abstract The strengthening technique by external cable prestressing, until now limited to columns with circular hollow sections (CHSs), is here extended to H-shaped steel columns. To provide an innovative general treatment, an initial imperfection, obtained from the analytical equivalence between Eurocode 3 and Ayrton–Perry formulations, is introduced. By this, a geometrically and materially nonlinear imperfection analysis (GMNIA) is performed by the finite element commercial code Abaqus. A parametric analysis identifies the deviator length, cable tension, and slenderness ratio as key parameters. Results confirm that, on the one hand, cable prestressing yields a critical load that is approximately twice that for non-prestressed elements (680 kN against 340 kN for a beam 8 m long); this effect grows with the column length. On the other hand, a simulation on a two-story frame supported by 12 columns, each 4 m long, spaced by 4 and 6 m in the two directions, under vertical ‘dead’ load shows that prestressed HEA200 columns perform as non-prestressed larger HEA220 profiles; thus, their use in this case leads to saving approximately 1.18 tons of steel; both these results are of practical interest in design of steel structures.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ziane_GIMNIA_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.66 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.66 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


