The durability of asphalt pavements is crucial for sustainable road infrastructures. This systematic review compares the Marshall and Superpave asphalt mix design protocols, with a particular focus on the integration of polymer-modified bitumen (PMB) and rejuvenators. Although the Marshall method remains widely used for its simplicity and cost-efficiency, its empirical basis limits its effectiveness to meet modern pavement performance demands. In contrast, the Superpave system offers improved resistance to rutting, longer fatigue life, and better mitigation of moisture damage. The review traces the evolution of asphalt mix design, identifies current challenges, and emphasizes the need for transitioning toward performance-based frameworks. Special attention is given to the incorporation of polymers such as Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS), Styrene-Butadiene-Rubber (SBR), and Polyethylene (PE), which significantly enhance the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures. The role of rejuvenators in restoring aged binders and enabling pavement recycling is also examined. Finally, the manuscript provides strategic recommendations for adopting Superpave to enhance pavement durability and reduce lifecycle maintenance costs. Overall, this comprehensive review advances knowledge on asphalt mix design, fostering innovation and sustainability while promoting long-term resilience in road pavement infrastructures.

Comparative Review of Marshall and Superpave Mix Designs: Enhancing Asphalt Performance with Polymers / Jatoi, G. H.; Loprencipe, G.; Moretti, L.. - In: MATERIALS. - ISSN 1996-1944. - 18:18(2025), pp. 1-18. [10.3390/ma18184273]

Comparative Review of Marshall and Superpave Mix Designs: Enhancing Asphalt Performance with Polymers

Jatoi G. H.;Loprencipe G.
;
Moretti L.
2025

Abstract

The durability of asphalt pavements is crucial for sustainable road infrastructures. This systematic review compares the Marshall and Superpave asphalt mix design protocols, with a particular focus on the integration of polymer-modified bitumen (PMB) and rejuvenators. Although the Marshall method remains widely used for its simplicity and cost-efficiency, its empirical basis limits its effectiveness to meet modern pavement performance demands. In contrast, the Superpave system offers improved resistance to rutting, longer fatigue life, and better mitigation of moisture damage. The review traces the evolution of asphalt mix design, identifies current challenges, and emphasizes the need for transitioning toward performance-based frameworks. Special attention is given to the incorporation of polymers such as Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS), Styrene-Butadiene-Rubber (SBR), and Polyethylene (PE), which significantly enhance the mechanical properties of asphalt mixtures. The role of rejuvenators in restoring aged binders and enabling pavement recycling is also examined. Finally, the manuscript provides strategic recommendations for adopting Superpave to enhance pavement durability and reduce lifecycle maintenance costs. Overall, this comprehensive review advances knowledge on asphalt mix design, fostering innovation and sustainability while promoting long-term resilience in road pavement infrastructures.
2025
Marshall mix design; superpave mix design; polymer-modified bitumen; rejuvenators
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Comparative Review of Marshall and Superpave Mix Designs: Enhancing Asphalt Performance with Polymers / Jatoi, G. H.; Loprencipe, G.; Moretti, L.. - In: MATERIALS. - ISSN 1996-1944. - 18:18(2025), pp. 1-18. [10.3390/ma18184273]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Jatoi_Comparative-review_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Frontespizio, abstract, articolo, bibliografia
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.9 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.9 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1750884
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact