Foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) are crucial in the foreign body reaction at the biomaterial-tissue interface, forming through the fusion of cells from the monocyte/macrophage lineage and performing functions such as material degradation and fibrous encapsulation. Yet, their presence and role in biomaterials research is only slowly unveiled. This review analyzed existing FBGC literature identified through a search string and sources from FBGC articles to evaluate the most commonly used methods and highlight the challenges in establishing a standardized protocol. Our findings revealed a fragmented research landscape marked by significant variability in in vitro culture conditions, i.e., cell origin and type, culture media and sera, fusion-inducing factors, seeding density, culture surface, and inconsistencies in the read-outs. This complicates efforts toward standardization and hampers cross-study comparisons. Based on these results, we highlight the need and propose guidelines for standardized culture protocols for FBGC research. Overall, this review aims to underscore the relevance of improving reproducibility and reliability in FBGC research, facilitating effective cross-study comparisons and advancing understanding of FBGC formation and function, ultimately contributing to designing more effective biomaterial-based therapies. Statement of significance: Foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) are crucial in the body's response to implanted biomaterials. Yet, current research addressing their role and impact is highly fragmented. This review comprehensively and systematically examines the diverse methodologies and definitions used in FBGC research and identifies critical gaps and inconsistencies hindering the reproducibility and comparison of findings. By advocating for standardized protocols, we aim to enhance the reliability and equivalence of research, thus providing a stronger foundation for understanding biomaterial-driven FBGC formation and function. Establishing such a framework will impact biomaterial-based therapies, supporting their effectiveness and safety in medical applications, and is thus of relevance for scientists, companies, and clinicians in the biomaterial and medical device communities.

A call for standardization: evaluating different methodologies to induce in vitro foreign body giant cell formation for biomaterials research and design / Conner, T. S.; Baaijens, F. P. T.; Bouten, C. V. C.; Angeloni, L.; Smits, A. I. P. M.. - In: ACTA BIOMATERIALIA. - ISSN 1742-7061. - 194:(2025), pp. 20-37. [10.1016/j.actbio.2025.01.026]

A call for standardization: evaluating different methodologies to induce in vitro foreign body giant cell formation for biomaterials research and design

Angeloni L.
Penultimo
Supervision
;
2025

Abstract

Foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) are crucial in the foreign body reaction at the biomaterial-tissue interface, forming through the fusion of cells from the monocyte/macrophage lineage and performing functions such as material degradation and fibrous encapsulation. Yet, their presence and role in biomaterials research is only slowly unveiled. This review analyzed existing FBGC literature identified through a search string and sources from FBGC articles to evaluate the most commonly used methods and highlight the challenges in establishing a standardized protocol. Our findings revealed a fragmented research landscape marked by significant variability in in vitro culture conditions, i.e., cell origin and type, culture media and sera, fusion-inducing factors, seeding density, culture surface, and inconsistencies in the read-outs. This complicates efforts toward standardization and hampers cross-study comparisons. Based on these results, we highlight the need and propose guidelines for standardized culture protocols for FBGC research. Overall, this review aims to underscore the relevance of improving reproducibility and reliability in FBGC research, facilitating effective cross-study comparisons and advancing understanding of FBGC formation and function, ultimately contributing to designing more effective biomaterial-based therapies. Statement of significance: Foreign body giant cells (FBGCs) are crucial in the body's response to implanted biomaterials. Yet, current research addressing their role and impact is highly fragmented. This review comprehensively and systematically examines the diverse methodologies and definitions used in FBGC research and identifies critical gaps and inconsistencies hindering the reproducibility and comparison of findings. By advocating for standardized protocols, we aim to enhance the reliability and equivalence of research, thus providing a stronger foundation for understanding biomaterial-driven FBGC formation and function. Establishing such a framework will impact biomaterial-based therapies, supporting their effectiveness and safety in medical applications, and is thus of relevance for scientists, companies, and clinicians in the biomaterial and medical device communities.
2025
Foreign body giant cells (FBGCS); Foreign body response (FBR); Immune response; In vitro, Cell-material interaction; Macrophage; Macrophage fusion; Multinucleated giant cells
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
A call for standardization: evaluating different methodologies to induce in vitro foreign body giant cell formation for biomaterials research and design / Conner, T. S.; Baaijens, F. P. T.; Bouten, C. V. C.; Angeloni, L.; Smits, A. I. P. M.. - In: ACTA BIOMATERIALIA. - ISSN 1742-7061. - 194:(2025), pp. 20-37. [10.1016/j.actbio.2025.01.026]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Conner_standardization_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 5.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
5.71 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1749807
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact